Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there. Did your doctor somehow miss the recovery protocol that Pedro Bach-y-Rita used to recover fully back in 1958 with only a partial brain?

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Showing posts with label muscle loss. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muscle loss. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

The surprising link between the size of your thighs and how long you'll live

 Which means your competent? doctor has to recover you 100% so you don't lose any muscle mass. Ask your doctor for specifics so you know what size thighs you need!

Can't or won't do that: PURE INCOMPETENCE!

The surprising link between the size of your thighs and how long you'll live

It turns out, thicker thighs may actually be the key to a long, healthy life.

Researchers have linked greater thigh strength and size to lower risks of heart disease, diabetes, cognitive decline and overall death. 

The thigh muscles, including the quadriceps, are among the body’s largest and most powerful muscles. They power everyday movement while helping support and protect our joints.

Beyond supporting everyday mobility, strong thighs may serve a greater purpose - better overall health and a longer lifespan. 

A five-year study published in The American Journal of Medicine examined the link between thigh strength and mortality in people with coronary artery disease (CAD), a condition in which plaque builds up in the arteries that supply blood to the heart.

Researchers studied 1,314 people with coronary artery disease, mostly men with an average age of 65, who had been hospitalized or undergone surgery for the condition.

Participants' quadriceps strength was measured using a dynamometer, a device that measures force, by having them push as hard as they could against it with their legs. 

They then compared leg strength with body weight to see how strong each participant’s legs were for their size. 

Researchers tracked the participants for the next five years, and during that time period, 118 people died from any cause, including 63 from cardiovascular disease.

The team discovered that people with 10 percent greater relative leg strength (leg strength compared with their body weight) had a 23 percent lower risk of death overall, and a 34 percent lower risk of dying from heart-related causes.  

Related video: Why your exercise could be doing more harm than you think (Talking With Docs)

 'Skeletal muscle weakness promotes exercise intolerance and physical inactivity. Reduced physical activity itself has been shown to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and frailty,' the study stated.

The research added: 'Importantly, resistance training can enhance muscle strength, muscle mass, and functional capacity.'

Thigh size may also protect against serious health problems. A 2020 study published in Endocrine Connections linked larger thigh circumference to lower odds of high blood pressure, particularly in overweight people. 

Researchers recruited 9,520 adults aged 40 and older from a larger Chinese community. They measured both thighs and took the average circumference. 

Participants' blood pressure was measured three times, with the average recorded. They were then split into three groups based on thigh size - small, medium and large - and had their blood pressure compared.

The rate of high blood pressure generally fell as thigh size increased, especially among overweight and obese people in the study.

The research, published in Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, evaluated 1,508 participants' leg strength using a dynamometer. 

They were then given a two minute cognitive test, where they matched specific symbols to numbers using a provided reference key.

The participants' scores were compared and researchers found that people with stronger legs performed better on the cognitive test.

To improve overall health and wellbeing, the best way to build thigh muscle is through strength training.

Compound moves like squats, leg presses, deadlifts and lunges can build muscle to support everyday movement, especially as you age. Aerobic exercises like cycling, walking and yoga can also improve flexibility, mobility and endurance. 

Read more


Monday, October 5, 2026

Stroke Recovery’s Hidden Divide: Frailty Paths Predicted by Mind and Mood

 

Make damn sure your competent? doctor has EXACT PROTOCOLS that prevent frailty/sarcopenia/muscle loss post stroke! Doesn't have them; fire him/her and replace your incompetent board of directors!

Stroke Recovery’s Hidden Divide: Frailty Paths Predicted by Mind and Mood

When an older adult survives a stroke, the visible battle often ends at discharge. But a new longitudinal study from China suggests that the quieter war against frailty is only beginning, and that the trajectory it follows over the following year may be charted within the first days of hospitalization. Researchers tracking more than three hundred stroke survivors aged 60 and older found that frailty does not follow a single path after stroke. Instead, patients split into three distinct courses over twelve months, and the forces steering them toward the worst outcomes were strikingly non-physical: impaired cognition, damaged mood, heavy comorbidity burdens, and thin social support.

The study, conducted at the Department of Neurology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, enrolled 314 consecutive older adults hospitalized for acute stroke between April and December 2024. Baseline assessments were completed within 48 hours of admission, capturing demographic and clinical characteristics, stroke severity measured on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, comorbidity burden, perceived social support, and five domains of what geriatricians call intrinsic capacity. Frailty itself was scored using the Fried Frailty Phenotype, a five-criterion instrument assessing unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and grip weakness. Follow-up assessments repeated the frailty measurement at three, six, and twelve months after discharge, and 293 participants—93.3 percent of the cohort—completed the full year of observation.

To make sense of the repeated measurements, the team turned to latent class growth modeling, a statistical technique that searches heterogeneous longitudinal data for hidden subgroups of people whose scores change in similar ways over time. Rather than averaging everyone’s frailty scores into a single trend line, the method asks whether the population actually contains several trend lines. Model selection relied on standard fit criteria, including the sample-size adjusted Bayesian Information Criterion and the adjusted Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, which together determine how many trajectory classes the data genuinely support. The answer was three, and the differences between them were clinically dramatic.

The largest group, comprising 67.24 percent of participants, followed a low-decreasing trajectory: they began with low frailty scores and improved further over the year, suggesting that for roughly two-thirds of older stroke survivors, recovery of physical resilience is the default course. A second group, 20.48 percent, was moderate-stable, entering the study with intermediate frailty and remaining there through all four assessments. The most concerning group, 12.29 percent of the sample, followed a high-increasing trajectory, starting with high frailty and growing progressively frailer across the twelve months after discharge. One in eight older stroke patients, in other words, does not merely fail to recover—they deteriorate steadily, and the study set out to identify who they are before the deterioration begins.

The answer came from multinomial logistic regression, which compared each trajectory group against the low-decreasing reference while adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Two findings stood out for their consistency across both unfavorable trajectories. Cognitive impairment, assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, roughly doubled the odds of belonging to the moderate-stable group (odds ratio 2.632, 95 percent confidence interval 1.263 to 5.488) and more than quadrupled the odds of landing in the high-increasing group (odds ratio 4.506, 95 percent confidence interval 1.846 to 11.002). Psychological impairment, screened with the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, showed a parallel pattern, tripling the odds of moderate-stable membership (odds ratio 3.671) and roughly tripling the odds of high-increasing membership (odds ratio 3.161). The mind, it appears, is not a bystander in physical recovery—it is a load-bearing pillar.

The high-increasing trajectory had its own additional risk architecture. Patients who had experienced moderate or severe strokes, rather than normal or mild ones, were far more likely to deteriorate; conversely, a normal or mild stroke reduced the odds of high-increasing membership by nearly three-quarters (odds ratio 0.271, 95 percent confidence interval 0.095 to 0.773). A high comorbidity burden, quantified with the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, nearly quadrupled the odds of the worsening trajectory (odds ratio 3.801, 95 percent confidence interval 1.610 to 8.978). And social connection mattered: low or moderate perceived social support, measured with the Perceived Social Support Scale, more than tripled the odds of belonging to the high-increasing group (odds ratio 3.171, 95 percent confidence interval 1.310 to 7.672). Frailty after stroke, the data imply, is not simply a matter of damaged brain tissue—it is the product of neurological injury layered on chronic disease, eroded cognition, depressed mood, and isolation.

The concept binding these threads together is intrinsic capacity, a framework promoted by the World Health Organization through its Integrated Care for Older People initiative. Intrinsic capacity refers to the composite of all an individual’s physical and mental capacities—locomotion, cognition, psychological state, vitality or nutrition, and sensory function—and the study assessed all five domains at baseline using validated instruments including the Short Physical Performance Battery, the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The WHO’s model treats aging not as a disease to be cured but as a dynamic balance between capacity and environment, and this study provides some of the most granular evidence yet that the framework has predictive teeth in a specific clinical population. Where capacity is compromised—particularly in the cognitive and psychological domains—the trajectory of frailty bends downward.

For geriatric nursing, the implications are concrete. The study’s authors argue that early multidomain assessment, performed within the first 48 hours of admission, can flag patients at risk of unfavorable frailty trajectories before they leave the hospital. A nurse armed with a cognitive screen, a depression scale, a comorbidity index, and a social support questionnaire can identify the roughly one in eight patients destined for progressive frailty and tailor post-discharge monitoring accordingly: closer follow-up intervals, cognitive rehabilitation referrals, psychological support, caregiver engagement, and structured social interventions. The alternative—waiting for frailty to declare itself in the community—may mean intervening a year too late, after slowness, exhaustion, and weight loss have already compounded.

The study’s design carries both strengths and limits worth noting. Its prospective longitudinal structure, near-complete follow-up, and use of a validated phenotype instrument lend credibility to the trajectory findings, and the statistical approach is well suited to the question of heterogeneous recovery. Yet the cohort was drawn from a single tertiary hospital in Nanjing, participants ranged only from 60 to 86 years with a mean age just under 69, and observational associations cannot prove that treating depression or bolstering social support would reroute a patient’s frailty course. Those questions demand intervention trials. Still, the core message is hard to dismiss: recovery from stroke in later life is a year-long process with predictable failure modes, and the earliest warning signs are written not in the legs but in the mind, the mood, and the web of people around the patient.

As populations age and stroke survival improves, the number of older adults living in the aftermath of stroke will only grow, and frailty will remain one of the strongest predictors of disability, institutionalization, and death in this group. What this study adds is a map—a way to see, within days of admission, which road a patient is likely to travel. Turning that map into better outcomes will require health systems to treat cognition, mood, and social connection not as soft extras but as core vital signs of post-stroke recovery, monitored and managed with the same urgency as blood pressure and mobility. The patients most at risk of a fading year are identifiable on day two. The task now is to act on what the data already show.

Subject of Research: Frailty trajectories and intrinsic capacity in older stroke survivors during the first year after hospital discharge

Article Title: Frailty trajectories from hospitalization to 12 months after discharge in older stroke survivors and their associations with intrinsic capacity: implications for geriatric nursing

Article References: Tang, X.-X., Tang, Q.-Y., Liu, L., Li, B.-B., Mei, J., & Yu, L. (2026). Frailty trajectories from hospitalization to 12 months after discharge in older stroke survivors and their associations with intrinsic capacity: implications for geriatric nursing. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08415-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12877-026-08415-5

Friday, October 2, 2026

Losing muscle may increase risk of developing dementia

 Your competent? doctor does have 100% recovery protocols, right? Or at least backup plans with NMES and Exercise-in-a-pill!

Oh NOTHING! So, COMPLETELY FUCKING INCOMPETENT THEN! 

And you haven't gotten them fired yet? What the hell are you waiting for? Your doctor to actually get you killed?

Losing muscle may increase risk of developing dementia

The lead researcher believes this "could be an important warning sign" for future assessments.

As we age, it’s normal to gradually lose some muscle. But when that loss becomes more significant and starts affecting your strength or ability to get around, it could be sarcopenia—an age-related decline in muscle mass, strength, and physical function.

Maintaining muscle is key to staying strong, mobile, and independent as you get older. And according to new research, there may be another reason to prioritize muscle health: Sarcopenia was linked to a higher risk of developing dementia.

What the study found

To better understand the link between muscle health, body weight, and dementia, an international team of researchers led by Curtin University in Australia analyzed 83 studies published between 2005 and 2026, including 14 that specifically examined sarcopenia.

In the studies examining sarcopenia, researchers assessed participants’ muscle health using measures like muscle mass, grip strength, and walking speed, then followed them over time to see who developed dementia. When the results were combined, people with sarcopenia had a 42% higher risk of developing dementia compared with those without the condition.

“Our findings suggest losing muscle could be an important warning sign for dementia risk,” says lead study author Dr. Uraiporn Booranasuksakul in a Curtin University press release.

Interestingly, the researchers also found a difference in the link between obesity and dementia depending on age. The study revealed that middle-aged people under 65 who were obese had a 9% higher risk of dementia, while obesity among those 65 and older was associated with a 17% lower risk of dementia.

They also looked at sarcopenic obesity—when someone has both low muscle mass or function and excess body fat—but found “no statistically significant link” between the condition and dementia.

What this means for healthy aging

Although the obesity findings were surprising, the researchers say it’s not a reason to gain weight as you age—it simply highlights that the link between aging, body weight, and dementia is layered.

“There is still a lot we don’t know about how changes in muscle and body fat interact over time,” corresponding author and professor Mario Siervo of Curtin’s School of Population Health adds in the press release.

While the study shows an association and does not prove that sarcopenia directly causes dementia, the findings offer another reason to prioritize muscle health as you get older. Staying physically active, incorporating strength training, and getting enough protein can all help preserve muscle mass and strength with age—and support your overall health along the way.

For daily wellness updates, subscribe to The Healthy newsletter and follow The Healthy on Facebook, Instagram, and Google. Keep reading:

Losing Muscle Could Also Increase Your Dementia Odds, Reveals New Study

 Let's make this clear; your doctor IS REQUIRED TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED! Failure is COMPLETE INCOMPETENCE! There are no excuses for failure!

Losing Muscle Could Also Increase Your Dementia Odds, Reveals New Study

The lead researcher believes this "could be an important warning sign" for future assessments.

As we age, it’s normal to gradually lose some muscle. But when that loss becomes more significant and starts affecting your strength or ability to get around, it could be sarcopenia—an age-related decline in muscle mass, strength, and physical function.

Maintaining muscle is key to staying strong, mobile, and independent as you get older. And according to new research, there may be another reason to prioritize muscle health: Sarcopenia was linked to a higher risk of developing dementia.

What the study found

To better understand the link between muscle health, body weight, and dementia, an international team of researchers led by Curtin University in Australia analyzed 83 studies published between 2005 and 2026, including 14 that specifically examined sarcopenia.

In the studies examining sarcopenia, researchers assessed participants’ muscle health using measures like muscle mass, grip strength, and walking speed, then followed them over time to see who developed dementia. When the results were combined, people with sarcopenia had a 42% higher risk of developing dementia compared with those without the condition.

“Our findings suggest losing muscle could be an important warning sign for dementia risk,” says lead study author Dr. Uraiporn Booranasuksakul in a Curtin University press release.

Interestingly, the researchers also found a difference in the link between obesity and dementia depending on age. The study revealed that middle-aged people under 65 who were obese had a 9% higher risk of dementia, while obesity among those 65 and older was associated with a 17% lower risk of dementia.

They also looked at sarcopenic obesity—when someone has both low muscle mass or function and excess body fat—but found “no statistically significant link” between the condition and dementia.

What this means for healthy aging

Although the obesity findings were surprising, the researchers say it’s not a reason to gain weight as you age—it simply highlights that the link between aging, body weight, and dementia is layered.

“There is still a lot we don’t know about how changes in muscle and body fat interact over time,” corresponding author and professor Mario Siervo of Curtin’s School of Population Health adds in the press release.

While the study shows an association and does not prove that sarcopenia directly causes dementia, the findings offer another reason to prioritize muscle health as you get older. Staying physically active, incorporating strength training, and getting enough protein can all help preserve muscle mass and strength with age—and support your overall health along the way.

For daily wellness updates, subscribe to The Healthy newsletter and follow The Healthy on Facebook, Instagram, and Google. Keep reading:

Losing Muscle Could Also Increase Your Dementia Odds, Reveals New Study

 Since your doctors and staff are complete failures at 100% recovery have they even thought about preventing sarcopenia via these other methods?

And don't know about these either?

NO? So, COMPLETELY FUCKING INCOMPETENT! And YOU haven't gotten them fired yet?

Losing Muscle Could Also Increase Your Dementia Odds, Reveals New Study

The lead researcher believes this "could be an important warning sign" for future assessments.

As we age, it’s normal to gradually lose some muscle. But when that loss becomes more significant and starts affecting your strength or ability to get around, it could be sarcopenia—an age-related decline in muscle mass, strength, and physical function.

Maintaining muscle is key to staying strong, mobile, and independent as you get older. And according to new research, there may be another reason to prioritize muscle health: Sarcopenia was linked to a higher risk of developing dementia.

What the study found

To better understand the link between muscle health, body weight, and dementia, an international team of researchers led by Curtin University in Australia analyzed 83 studies published between 2005 and 2026, including 14 that specifically examined sarcopenia.

In the studies examining sarcopenia, researchers assessed participants’ muscle health using measures like muscle mass, grip strength, and walking speed, then followed them over time to see who developed dementia. When the results were combined, people with sarcopenia had a 42% higher risk of developing dementia compared with those without the condition.

“Our findings suggest losing muscle could be an important warning sign for dementia risk,” says lead study author Dr. Uraiporn Booranasuksakul in a Curtin University press release.

Interestingly, the researchers also found a difference in the link between obesity and dementia depending on age. The study revealed that middle-aged people under 65 who were obese had a 9% higher risk of dementia, while obesity among those 65 and older was associated with a 17% lower risk of dementia.

They also looked at sarcopenic obesity—when someone has both low muscle mass or function and excess body fat—but found “no statistically significant link” between the condition and dementia.

What this means for healthy aging

Although the obesity findings were surprising, the researchers say it’s not a reason to gain weight as you age—it simply highlights that the link between aging, body weight, and dementia is layered.

“There is still a lot we don’t know about how changes in muscle and body fat interact over time,” corresponding author and professor Mario Siervo of Curtin’s School of Population Health adds in the press release.

While the study shows an association and does not prove that sarcopenia directly causes dementia, the findings offer another reason to prioritize muscle health as you get older. Staying physically active, incorporating strength training, and getting enough protein can all help preserve muscle mass and strength with age—and support your overall health along the way.

For daily wellness updates, subscribe to The Healthy newsletter and follow The Healthy on Facebook, Instagram, and Google. Keep reading:

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Popular Supplement Shows Potential to Improve Muscle Strength Without Training: Study

 What is your competent? doctor's EXACT PROTCOL  to prevent muscle loss? Doesn't have any? PURE INCOMPETENCE! 

And you haven't gotten the staff fired yet?

And doesn't know about these either?

Popular Supplement Shows Potential to Improve Muscle Strength Without Training: Study

Friday, September 25, 2026

One common midlife condition linked to 42% higher dementia risk

 If your doctor doesn't have EXACT PROTOCOLS TO PREVENT SARCOPENIA! THAT IS PURE INCOMPETENCE! 

You then need to get the board of directors fired for incompetence also, just like fish rots from the head. Likely means YOU need to reconstitute the whole hospital, nothing is salvageable!

One common midlife condition linked to 42% higher dementia risk

A common midlife condition affecting many older adults could significantly raise an individual’s risk of dementia, according to new research.

Published in International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, the study found that maintaining muscle strength as a person navigates midlife is crucial in the fight against dementia when they age.

‘An important warning sign’

That finding is somewhat complicated, since another major risk factor for dementia is obesity. If a person loses weight without strength training, they are likely to lose muscle as well.

Counterintuitively, that could increase their dementia risk, even as their body fat goes down.

“It’s not just about how much you weigh—maintaining muscle strength and function also appears to be important as we age,” lead researcher Dr. Uraiporn Booranasuksakul from Burapha University said in a press release.

“Our findings suggest losing muscle could be an important warning sign for dementia risk.”The researchers found that sarcopenia—the medical term for loss of strength and muscle—was associated with a 42-percent greater risk of dementia. Sarcopenia often occurs when a person gets older.

Interestingly, the researchers found that obesity before the age of 65 was linked to a nine-percent greater risk of dementia.

However, after an individual turns 65, obesity was linked to a 17-percent lower risk—a finding that showed how crucial strength is as a person ages.

“We found that obesity in middle age was linked to a higher risk of dementia, but this relationship changed in later life,” study corresponding author Mario Siervo said in the release.

“This does not mean people should gain weight as they get older. Rather, it shows us that the relationship between body weight, aging and dementia is complex.”

‘A lot we don’t know’

Siervo added that the relationship between weight loss, muscle loss and dementia is complex, and more research is needed.

“There is still a lot we don’t know about how changes in muscle and body fat interact over time,” Siervo said.

The research is especially relevant as weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro sweep through the market.

Studies linking weight loss to lower risk of dementia suggest that GLP-1s could be beneficial for an aging population, especially in the United States where the CDC says two in five adults experience obesity.

Other research shows that almost half of dementia cases could be prevented by lifestyle changes.

Still, the latest study suggests that weight loss alone doesn’t tell the whole story.

“Maintaining muscle is an important part of healthy aging, and regular physical activity and good nutrition can help support muscle strength and function,” Booranasuksakul said.

Newsweek has reached out to the study authors for comment via email.

Related Articles

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial