Your competent? doctor has had over a decade to put together a protocol on this to help you recover. WAS ANYTHING DONE? NO? Then you don't have a functioning stroke doctor, hospital or therapists!
The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review
CHRISTOPHER PAUL LATIMER, JUSTINE KEELING, BRODERICK LIN,MEREDITH HENDERSON & LEIGH ANNE HALE
Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Accepted November 2009
Abstract
Purpose.
To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function inadults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.
Method.
Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles wereevaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Datarelating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.
Results.
Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eightstudies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing(BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRACstudies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27.
Conclusion.
There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however morequality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.
Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Accepted November 2009
Abstract
Purpose.
To determine the evidence for bilateral therapy interventions aimed at improving upper limb (UL) function inadults with a range of UL activity limitations due to a first time chronic stroke.
Method.
Seven databases were searched prior to 2008 for articles reporting experimental studies investigating bilateral UL interventions on functional outcome in participants with a first stroke, 6 or more months prior. Included articles wereevaluated with the quality index, a tool which evaluates the quality of both randomised and non-randomised studies. Datarelating to study design and functional outcome were extracted.
Results.
Nine articles were included; three reported on randomised controlled trials (RCT) and six on cohort studies. Eightstudies incorporated a mechanical device as their bilateral intervention. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing(BATRAC) was the most commonly used mechanically based intervention, and three of the four uncontrolled BATRACstudies reported significant improvements in UL function post-intervention, however these results were not substantiated by a RCT study of the BATRAC intervention. One study demonstrated significant functional improvements after 6 days of training with a non-mechanical bilateral task. Of the four studies that performed a follow-up assessment, three reported significant improvement in UL function. Quality index ratings of the included studies ranged from 18 to 25 out of 27.
Conclusion.
There is some evidence that bilateral therapy improves function in adults with chronic stroke, however morequality RCTs are required to strengthen this evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment