Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, April 4, 2025

Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Brain Swelling in Thrombolyzed Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Results

 

 WHOM is going to create protocols based on all this earlier research?  SPECIFIC NAMES ONLY, none of this general  crapola of followup should occur.  If your doctor and stroke hospital can't provide a specific name, THEY NEED TO BE FIRED.  I take no prisoners in trying to solve stroke, that means your doctors and PhDers need to do their job. 100% stroke recovery for all. NO EXCUSES.  

Did your stroke hospital do ANYTHING AT ALL with this earlier research? Or were they incompetent like usual?

Our laboratory has now shown that substance P is released during stroke. And blocking substance P receptors following stroke subsequently reduces brain swelling and improves outcome and survival in rats May 2012 

 

Radically New Patented Technology Highly Effective In Reducing Cerebral Oedema May 2012 

 

Discovery paves way for treatments to prevent brain damage or death following head trauma April 2015 

 

Innovative treatment may help prevent brain swelling, death in stroke patients April 2016 

 

New biodegradable pressure sensor could help monitor serious health conditions

January 2018

 


Injected Nanoparticles May Provide First Real Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury  January 2020

Because our incompetent stroke medical 'professionals' still haven't figured out an EXACT BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL post stroke! And YOU bear the failure of that! Hope your competent? doctor guesses correctly because the poor outcome happens to you! Your doctor gets off scot-free and still gets paid! My non-medical thinking on this is that by doing this you are vastly lowering the oxygen supply to the brain thus hastening the neuronal cascade of death!

The latest here, once again describing a problem but PROVIDING NO SOLUTION! How incompetent can you be and still employed in stroke?

Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Brain Swelling in Thrombolyzed Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Results

  • Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Cerebral swelling in relation to cytotoxic edema is a predictor of poor outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and elevated blood pressure (BP) promotes its development. Whether intensive BP-lowering treatment reduces cerebral swelling is uncertain. We aimed to determine whether intensive BP lowering reduces the severity of cerebral swelling after thrombolysis for AIS.

    METHODS:

    A secondary analysis of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study), a partial factorial, international, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized controlled trial of alteplase dose and levels of BP control in thrombolyzed patients with AIS. Participants were randomly assigned to intensive (systolic target 130–140 mm Hg within 1 hour; maintained for 72 hours) or guideline-recommended (systolic target <180 mm Hg) BP management. Available serial brain images (baseline and follow-up, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) were centrally analyzed with standardized techniques (Apollo MIStar software) by expert readers blind to clinical details to rate swelling severity (from 0 no to 6 most severe swelling [midline shift and effacement of basal cisterns]) and other abnormalities. Primary outcome was any cerebral swelling (score, 1–6) in logistic regression models.

    RESULTS:

    Of 1477/2196 (67.3%) patients (mean age, 67.7 years; female, 39.6%) with sequential scans, the between-group mean systolic BP difference was 6.6 mm Hg over 24 hours. No significant difference was found in the treatment effect on any cerebral swelling between intensive and guideline-recommended BP management (22.12% versus 22.39%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81–1.36]; P=0.71). Results were consistent across different groups of swelling severity (swelling score 2–6, 3–6, and 4–6; and ordinal shift on swelling score).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Modest early intensive BP lowering does not seem to alter cerebral swelling in thrombolyzed patients with AIS. Further research is needed to quantify brain edema to allow a better understanding of the complex relations of BP and outcomes from AIS.

    Graphical Abstract

    Get full access to this article

    No comments:

    Post a Comment