Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on symptoms and quality of life among service members with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a randomized clinical trial

I wonder when someone will finally put 2 and 2 together and come out with a statement that HBOT doesn't work.

Oxygen therapy no better than placebo for treating concussion, study finds

Can Hyperbaric Oxygen Repair the Damaged Brain?

Mayo clinics take:

Agency Research for Healthcare and Quality:

hbot as stroke therapy - quackery?

Peter Levine talking about problems of HBOT here:

Stroke and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

Enormous Inferno Kills Man Who Tried Smoking a Cigarette in a Hyperbaric Chamber

 The latest here:

Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on symptoms and quality of life among service members with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a randomized clinical trial
Improvement has been anecdotally observed in patients with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PCS) after mild traumatic brain injury following treatment with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO). The effectiveness of HBO as an adjunctive treatment for PCS is unknown to date. To compare the safety of and to estimate the efficacy for symptomatic outcomes from standard PCS care alone, care supplemented with HBO, or a sham procedure. Among service members with persistent PCS, HBO showed no benefits over sham compressions. Both intervention groups demonstrated improved outcomes compared with PCS care alone. This finding suggests that the observed improvements were not oxygen mediated but may reflect nonspecific improvements related to placebo effects.
Methods

• Multicenter, double–blind, sham–controlled clinical trial of 72 military service members with ongoing symptoms at least 4 months after mild traumatic brain injury enrolled at military hospitals in Colorado, North Carolina, California, and Georgia between April 26, 2011, and August 24, 2012.
• Assessments occurred before randomization, at the midpoint, and within 1 month after completing the interventions.
• Routine PCS care was provided in specialized clinics.
• In addition, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to 40 HBO sessions administered at 1.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA), 40 sham sessions consisting of room air at 1.2 ATA, or no supplemental chamber procedures.
• The Rivermead Post–Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) served as the primary outcome measure.
• A change score of at least 2 points on the RPQ–3 subscale (range, 0–12) was defined as clinically significant.
• Change scores from baseline were calculated for the RPQ–3 and for the total RPQ.
• Secondary measures included additional patient–reported outcomes and automated neuropsychometric testing.

Results

• On average, participants had sustained 3 lifetime mild traumatic brain injuries; the most recent occurred 23 months before enrollment.
• No differences were observed between groups for improvement of at least 2 points on the RPQ–3 subscale (25% in the no intervention group, 52% in the HBO group, and 33% in the sham group; P=.24).
• Compared with the no intervention group (mean change score, 0.5; 95% CI, -4.8 to 5.8; P =.91), both groups undergoing supplemental chamber procedures showed improvement in symptoms on the RPQ (mean change score, 5.4; 95% CI, -0.5 to 11.3; P=.008 in the HBO group and 7.0; 95% CI, 1.0–12.9; P=.02 in the sham group).
• No difference between the HBO group and the sham group was observed (P=.70).
• Chamber sessions were well tolerated.