I do about 2 hours daily, my rumination is about my social life and where I'm going next, not my disability. But have they tested a 90 minute walk in nature swatting mosquitoes? For us stroke survivors this is a real problem, no ability to swat mosquitoes landing on the good arm. How often is your doctor or therapist getting you out into nature to stop your rumination of the problems you are having from your stroke?
Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation
- Contributed by Gretchen C. Daily, May 28, 2015 (sent for review March 9, 2015; reviewed by Leslie Baxter, Elliot T. Berkman, and Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg)
Significance
More
than 50% of people now live in urban areas. By 2050 this proportion
will be 70%. Urbanization is associated with increased levels of mental
illness, but it’s not yet clear why. Through a controlled experiment, we
investigated whether nature experience would influence rumination
(repetitive thought focused on negative aspects of the self), a known
risk factor for mental illness. Participants who went on a 90-min walk
through a natural environment reported lower levels of rumination and
showed reduced neural activity in an area of the brain linked to risk
for mental illness compared with those who walked through an urban
environment. These results suggest that accessible natural areas may be
vital for mental health in our rapidly urbanizing world.
Abstract
Urbanization
has many benefits, but it also is associated with increased levels of
mental illness, including depression. It has been suggested that
decreased nature experience may help to explain the link between
urbanization and mental illness. This suggestion is supported by a
growing body of correlational and experimental evidence, which raises a
further question: what mechanism(s) link decreased nature experience to
the development of mental illness? One such mechanism might be the
impact of nature exposure on rumination, a maladaptive pattern of
self-referential thought that is associated with heightened risk for
depression and other mental illnesses. We show in healthy participants
that a brief nature experience, a 90-min walk in a natural setting,
decreases both self-reported rumination and neural activity in the
subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC), whereas a 90-min walk in an urban
setting has no such effects on self-reported rumination or neural
activity. In other studies, the sgPFC has been associated with a
self-focused behavioral withdrawal linked to rumination in both
depressed and healthy individuals. This study reveals a pathway by which
nature experience may improve mental well-being and suggests that
accessible natural areas within urban contexts may be a critical
resource for mental health in our rapidly urbanizing world.
- environmental neuroscience
- nature experience
- rumination
- psychological ecosystem services
- emotion regulation
Never before has such a large percentage of humanity been so far removed from nature (1); more than 50% of people now live in urban areas, and by 2050, this proportion will be 70% (2).
What are the potential mental health implications of this demographic
shift? Although urbanization has many benefits, it is also associated
with increased levels of mental illness, including anxiety disorders and
depression (3⇓–5). Causal mechanisms for this increased prevalence of mental illness are likely manifold and are not well understood (6, 7).
One
aspect of urbanization that has attracted research attention in recent
years is a corresponding decrease in nature experience (8, 9).
Using a variety of methodologies, researchers have demonstrated
affective and cognitive benefits of nature experience, thereby
contributing to an evolving understanding of the types of psychological
benefits of which humanity may be deprived as urbanization continues.
Correlational findings show that growing up in rural vs. urban settings
is associated with lesser stress responsivity (3).
A recent longitudinal study, tracking the well-being and mental
distress of more than 10,000 people over a period of nearly two decades
demonstrates a significant positive effect of proximity to greenspace on
well-being (9).
This effect traces to living location within the same individuals as
they moved closer or further from greenspace. Other correlational
studies reveal that window views that include natural elements (compared
with window views that do not) are associated with superior memory,
attention, and impulse inhibition (10), as well as greater feelings of subjective well-being (11).
These correlational findings are buttressed by experimental findings
showing, for example, that nature experience (usually in urban
greenspace) can improve memory and attention (12) and increase positive mood (13).
Experimenters also have used psychophysiological methods to
characterize the ways in which images and sounds of the natural
environment lead to decreased stress and negative emotion after
participants have been subjected to stressful stimuli (14, 15).
Taken together, these and numerous other studies provide compelling
evidence that nature experience may confer real psychological benefits.
Although
this body of work is now substantial, there remains a fundamental yet
unanswered question: by what mechanism(s) might nature experience buffer
against the development of mental illness? One possible mechanism—and
our focus here—is a decrease in rumination, a maladaptive pattern of
self-referential thought that is associated with heightened risk for
depression and other mental illnesses (16⇓–18) and with activity in the subgenual prefrontal cortex (sgPFC) (19). The sgPFC has been shown to display increased activity during sadness (20) and the behavioral withdrawal and negative self-reflective processes tied to rumination in healthy (21) and depressed (22⇓–24) individuals.
Rumination
is a prolonged and often maladaptive attentional focus on the causes
and consequences of emotions—most often, negative, self-relational
emotions (25). This pattern of thought has been shown to predict the onset of depressive episodes (17), as well as other mental disorders (26).
Positive or neutral distraction (vs. maladaptive distractions such as
binge drinking of alcohol) has been shown to decrease rumination (27).
To be effective in decreasing rumination, these positive or neutral
distractions must be engrossing, to maintain the shift of attention onto
the distracting stimuli (27).
From this perspective, we aimed to observe whether a 90-min nature
experience has the potential to decrease rumination. In addition to
gathering self-report measures, we examined brain activity in the sgPFC,
an area that has been shown to be particularly active during the type
of maladaptive, self-reflective thought and behavioral withdrawal that
occurs during rumination (19).
This behavioral and neural evidence—when taken together—would provide
convincing evidence for a change in rumination resultant from nature
experience.
We quantified the impacts of a brief nature
experience on rumination and neural activity in the sgPFC through a
controlled experiment, comparing changes that occur in a 90-min nature
walk to those in a 90-min urban walk. We hypothesized that we would
observe decreased rumination and decreased neural activity in the sgPFC
for urban residents who experienced a nature walk, whereas we would not
observe such a decrease in those who experienced an urban walk. We
obtained measures of individuals’ self-reported levels of rumination
using the rumination portion of the Reflection Rumination Questionnaire
(RRQ) (28).
We documented activity in the sgPFC by using a neuroimaging method
called arterial spin labeling (ASL, presented more fully in Methods),
through which we measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF): the
volume of cerebral blood passing through the region of interest. This
technique can detect effects associated with longer-lasting
psychological phenomena such as rumination, in contrast to momentary,
reactive emotional responses such as a startle response (29).
Thirty-eight
healthy participants took part in the study. Although rumination is
often studied in the context of clinically depressed individuals, we
studied participants with no history of mental disorder to broaden the
applicability of our findings. Our sample comprised individuals residing
in urban environments. We posited that these individuals, although
currently healthy, would enter the study with a somewhat elevated level
of rumination resulting from the ongoing and chronic stressors
associated with urban experience, and their corresponding deprivation of
regular contact with nature. We therefore hypothesized that a nature
experience would reduce the baseline rumination levels of such
participants, compared with those who had an urban experience.
On
arrival at our laboratory, each participant completed a self-report
measure of rumination (RRQ) and underwent our scanning procedure. We
then randomly assigned each participant to a 90-min walk in either a
natural environment (19 participants) or urban environment (19
participants). The nature walk took place near Stanford University, in a
greenspace comprising grassland with scattered oak trees and shrubs.
The urban walk took place on the busiest thoroughfare in nearby Palo
Alto (El Camino Real), a street with three to four lanes in each
direction and a steady stream of traffic (Fig. S1).
After the walk, each participant returned to the laboratory and
provided a second, follow-up self-report of levels of rumination (RRQ)
before undergoing a second resting-state ASL scan. Transportation to and
from the walk was via a car ride of 15-min duration (for both walks).
Participants were given a smartphone and told to take 10 photographs
during their walk (Fig. S2).
These photographs were used to verify that participants went on the
walk. We also tracked the phone itself during the walk, as further
verification that the correct route was taken by each participant.
Results
To
analyze the impact of nature experience on self-reported rumination, we
conducted a two-way ANOVA, with time as a within-subjects factor
(before vs. after the walk) and environment as a between-subjects factor
(nature walk vs. urban walk). This analysis revealed an interaction
between time and environment [F(1,35) = 3.51, P = 0.07,
No comments:
Post a Comment