Is your hospital competent enough to be studying this?
Do you prefer your hospital incompetence NOT KNOWING? OR NOT DOING?
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Time to Pass the Torch
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Abstract
Alteplase,
a biosynthetic form of human tissue‐type plasminogen activator, is Food
and Drug Administration‐approved for the treatment of acute ischemic
stroke and currently the standard of care for thrombolytic therapy.
Tenecteplase, a modified form of alteplase using recombinant technology,
has several pharmacological advantages over alteplase, including longer
half‐life, higher fibrin specificity, and greater resistance to
plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1. Additionally, tenecteplase is given
as a single bolus administration compared to the bolus plus 1‐hour
continuous infusion of alteplase. Given these pharmacologic and
logistical differences along with studies demonstrating noninferiority
compared with alteplase, tenecteplase has become an alternative
thrombolytic for the management of acute ischemic stroke. There is a
growing body of evidence that suggests tenecteplase is a safe and
effective alternative to alteplase. This systematic review evaluates the
available literature for the use of tenecteplase in acute ischemic
stroke and provides relevant discussion regarding role in therapy,
therapeutic strategies, and areas requiring further research.
No comments:
Post a Comment