Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Use of cortical hemodynamic responses in digital therapeutics for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke

 If there is something here that gets survivors recovered, I don't see it.

Use of cortical hemodynamic responses in digital therapeutics for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke

Abstract

Background

Stroke causes long-term disabilities, highlighting the need for innovative rehabilitation strategies for reducing residual impairments. This study explored the potential of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for monitoring cortical activation during rehabilitation using digital therapeutics.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 18 patients with chronic stroke, of whom 13 were men. The mean age of the patients was 67.0 ± 7.1 years. Motor function was evaluated through various tests, including the Fugl–Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE), grip and pinch strength test, and box and block test. All the patients completed the digital rehabilitation program (MotoCog®, Cybermedic Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea) while being monitored using fNIRS (NIRScout®, NIRx Inc., Germany). Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was employed to analyze the cortical activation patterns from the fNIRS data. Furthermore, the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) algorithm was used to analyze task performance and fNIRS data to classify the severity of motor impairment.

Results

The participants showed diverse task performances in the digital rehabilitation program, demonstrating distinct patterns of cortical activation that correlated with different motor function levels. Significant activation was observed in the ipsilesional primary motor area (M1), primary somatosensory area (S1), and contralateral prefrontal cortex. The activation patterns varied according to the FMA-UE scores. Positive correlations were observed between the FMA-UE scores and SPM t-values in the ipsilesional M1, whereas negative correlations were observed in the ipsilesional S1, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe. The incorporation of cortical hemodynamic responses with task scores in a digital rehabilitation program substantially improves the accuracy of the K-NN algorithm in classifying upper limb functional levels in patients with stroke. The accuracy for tasks, such as the gas stove-operation task, increased from 44.4% using only task scores to 83.3% when these scores were combined with oxy-Hb t-values from the ipsilesional M1.

Conclusions

The results advocated the development of tailored digital rehabilitation strategies by combining the behavioral and cerebral hemodynamic data of patients with stroke. This approach aligns with the evolving paradigm of personalized rehabilitation in stroke recovery, highlighting the need for further extensive research to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

Background

Stroke, which has become increasingly prevalent with the global aging population, poses a significant public health challenge, leading to long-term disabilities and substantial burden on healthcare systems [1]. This condition results from cerebral vascular events that cause brain damage, which manifests in various impairments ranging from motor and cognitive to emotional and linguistic difficulties, substantially affecting individuals’ quality of life [2]. Effective rehabilitation is essential for improving functional recovery, reducing disabilities, and enabling the reintegration of stroke survivors into daily life, thus alleviating the socioeconomic burdens on their families and healthcare systems [3].

To create more engaging and interactive rehabilitation experiences, recent advancements in digital technology have introduced innovative approaches to rehabilitation, employing wearable technology, gamification principles, and virtual reality (VR) systems [4, 5]. These digital rehabilitation programs leverage advanced sensors and data analytics for precise patient assessment and personalized treatment plans [6]. Furthermore, artificial intelligence algorithms process data obtained through digital platforms, optimizing therapeutic outcomes by tailoring rehabilitation programs to individual needs and enhancing treatment effectiveness and personalization [7, 8].

Understanding neuroplasticity, which refers to the brain’s ability to create new neural connections, is fundamental for the development of effective neurorehabilitation strategies [9, 10]. This concept underpins treatments aimed at leveraging neural plasticity for recovery, supported by functional brain imaging research that highlights the brain’s capacity for reorganization and adaptation following a stroke [10]. Despite the recognized benefits of digital technologies in rehabilitation, the detailed relationship between cortical activation and rehabilitation outcomes remains unclear. Notwithstanding its limitations, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers advantages such as low cost, portability, and resilience to motion artifacts, making it a promising tool for understanding and using brain activation and plasticity in digital rehabilitation [11, 12].

This preliminary study was conducted to investigate cortical activation during stroke rehabilitation, as indicated by cerebral hemodynamic signals measured through fNIRS during digital rehabilitation. The first objective was to determine the characteristics of brain activation captured by cerebral hemodynamic response signals during digital rehabilitation. The second objective was to determine whether machine learning algorithms can effectively classify brain signals and elucidate patients’ functional status. The third objective was to improve our understanding of the intricate relationship between neurophysiological changes and functional motor performance in digital rehabilitation.

More at link.

No comments:

Post a Comment