Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Impact of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with acute stroke: a retrospective case-matched study

Useless, NO protocol and these guidelines have been out there September 2012.  You really think your doctor knows about a miniscule portion of these 128 research articles?

 

Impact of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with acute stroke: a retrospective case-matched study



  • Tsung-Han Ho
  • Fu-Chi Yang
  • Ruei-Ching Lin
  • Wu-Chien Chien
  • Chi-Hsiang Chung
  • Shang-Lin Chiang
  • Chung-Hsing Chou
  • Chia-Kuang Tsai
  • Chia-Lin Tsai
  • Yu-Kai Lin
  • Jiunn-Tay Lee
  • Tsung-Han Ho
    • 1
  • Fu-Chi Yang
    • 1
  • Ruei-Ching Lin
    • 2
  • Wu-Chien Chien
    • 3
  • Chi-Hsiang Chung
    • 4
  • Shang-Lin Chiang
    • 5
  • Chung-Hsing Chou
    • 1
    • 6
  • Chia-Kuang Tsai
    • 1
    • 6
  • Chia-Lin Tsai
    • 1
    • 6
  • Yu-Kai Lin
    • 1
  • Jiunn-Tay Lee
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyTri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Nursing, Tri-Service General HospitalNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Medical Research, Tri-Service General HospitalNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.School of Public HealthNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  5. 5.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of MedicineNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
  6. 6.Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesNational Defense Medical CenterTaipeiTaiwan
Original Communication

Abstract

Background and objectives

To date, the efficacy of the virtual reality (VR) application for acute stroke compared with conventional therapy (CT) remains unclear. This retrospective study aims to assess the impact of adjuvant VR technology on multidimensional therapy for patients with acute-stage stroke.

Methods

100 acute ischemic stroke patients with onset within 7 days who underwent combined adjuvant VR-based rehabilitation program and CT (intervention group–VR + CT) were compared to an equal number of cross-matched patients who received CT alone. While the intervention group received 40-min CT plus 20-min VR program (seven times for 1 week), the comparison group received time-matched CT alone. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), medical cost-effectiveness, and shortening of hospital stay were used as outcome measures.

Results

Posttreatment, the VR + CT group revealed significantly improved NIHSS and mRS (P < 0.001), whereas only the mRS improvement was remarkable in the CT group. In between-group comparisons, the intervention group had better improvements of symptom severity (NIHSS percentage improvement from the baseline; 20.18% vs. 4.59%, P < 0.005), functional outcomes (mRS improvement from the baseline; − 0.58 vs. − 0.23, P < 0.001), and reduced medical cost (Taiwan dollar; 49474 vs. 66306, P < 0.005). Furthermore, the VR + CT group reached markedly higher proportion of functional independence in activities of daily living (mRS, 0–2) at discharge compared with the CT group (68% vs. 60%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the combination of VR-based rehabilitation and traditional therapy could be more effective for neurorehabilitation than CT alone in the early improvement of symptom severity, functional outcomes, and lower medical expenditure in acute stroke patients.

No comments:

Post a Comment