Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, September 18, 2019

Do aspirin’s CVD benefits actually improve survival? Not for all, say new findings

For discussion with your doctor. 

Do aspirin’s CVD benefits actually improve survival? Not for all, say new findings

John Murphy, MDLinx | September 18, 2019
If you’re over 70 years of age and healthy, don’t take low-dose aspirin: it won’t prolong your disability-free survival, even if you’re at the highest risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), according to researchers who presented their findings at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2019 on August 31 in Paris, France.
Advertisement
Healthy people over age 70—even those with the greatest CVD risk—shouldn’t take daily low-dose aspirin to prevent CVD.
“An ever-increasing number of people reach the age of 70 without overt cardiovascular disease. This analysis suggests that improved risk prediction methods are needed to identify those who could benefit from daily low-dose aspirin,” said cardiovascular epidemiologist Christopher Reid, PhD, professorial research fellow, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, who made the presentation on behalf of the research team. 
This conclusion builds on research—the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial—that these authors published last year. In that randomized, placebo-controlled trial, low-dose (100 mg) daily aspirin did not extend disability-free survival (defined as the absence of dementia, persistent physical disability, or death) in people aged 70 years or over with no known CVD, nor did aspirin significantly lower CVD risk in these patients. Instead, aspirin led to a higher rate of major bleeding compared with placebo.

No survival benefit

Aspirin has been used for centuries for its medicinal properties. But in recent years, preventative use of aspirin has become widespread, even in people who have no medical indication for it.
In the current study, the researchers investigated whether patients’ baseline CVD risk could affect their disability-free survival. The investigators also conducted analyses on all-cause mortality, major hemorrhage, and prevention of CVD.

Using data from 19,114 participants in the ASPREE trial, the investigators calculated 10-year CVD risk scores for all participants and then sorted the participants into three groups: low CVD risk, intermediate CVD risk, and high CVD risk. The researchers also analyzed rates of disability-free survival, mortality, major bleeding, and cardiovascular disease for each risk group, and compared outcomes between those taking aspirin and placebo.
For participants with the lowest CVD risk, aspirin provided no benefit for disability-free survival or cardiovascular disease. This group also had the highest likelihood for bleeding.
On the other hand, those with the highest cardiovascular risk had lower CVD rates on aspirin (HR: 0.72-0.75) but similar rates of bleeding. Nevertheless, reduced cardiovascular events didn’t result in significantly improved disability-free survival in these participants (HR: 0.86-0.89).
“The findings emphasize that the risk-benefit trade-off for aspirin use in healthy older men and women varies across levels of cardiovascular risk,” Dr. Reid said. “It also indicates that the reduction in CVD events in the highest risk groups using current stratification methods does not identify individuals in whom this advantage translates into longer disability-free surviva

No comments:

Post a Comment