Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, August 12, 2022

TAGE Score for Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Prediction After Successful Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Well fuck, you solve the problem of preventing intracranial hemorrhage rather than this lazy prediction research. I'd have you all fired for totally missing the objectives of all stroke research; 100% recovery.

Didn't this research from March 2021 already answer this question? And your mentors and senior researchers didn't know about it and approved this anyway. My god, there is a lot of dead wood in stroke that needs to be removed.

Early Venous Filling Following Thrombectomy: Association With Hemorrhagic Transformation and Functional Outcome March 2021

The latest here:

TAGE Score for Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Prediction After Successful Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038088Stroke. 2022;0:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038088

Background:

Determine if early venous filling (EVF) after complete successful recanalization with mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke is an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and integrate EVF into a risk score for sICH prediction.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with anterior acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy issued from patients enrolled in the THRACE trial (Thrombectomie des Artères Cérébrales) and from 2 prospective registries were included and divided into a derivation (Center I; n=402) and validation cohorts (THRACE and center 2; n=507). EVF was evaluated by 2 blinded readers. sICH was defined according to the modified European cooperative acute stroke study II. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed in the derivation cohort (C1) to identify independent predictors of sICH and construct a predictive score test on the validation cohort (THRACE + C2).

Results:

Symptomatic ICH rate was similar between the two cohorts (9.9% and 8.9% respectively, P=0.9). Time from onset-to-successful recanalization >270 minutes (odds ratio [OR], 7.8 [95% CI, 2.5–24]), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (≤5 [OR, 2.49 (95% CI, 1.8–8.1) or 6–7 [OR, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03–4.46)]), glucose blood level >7 mmol/L (OR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.26–6.7]), and EVF presence (OR, 11.9 [95% CI, 3.8–37.5]) were independent predictors of sICH and constituted the Time–Alberta Stroke Program Early CT–Glycemia–EVF score. Time–Alberta Stroke Program Early CT–Glycemia–EVF score was associated with an increased risk of sICH in the derivation cohort (OR increase per unit, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.53–2.59]; P<0.001) with area under the curve, 0.832 [95% CI, 0.767–0.898]. The score had good performance in the validation cohort (area under the curve, 0.801 [95% CI, 0.69–0.91]).

Conclusions:

Time–Alberta Stroke Program Early CT–Glycemia–EVF score is a simple tool with readily available clinical variables with good performances for sICH prediction after mechanical thrombectomy.

REGISTRATION:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01062698.


No comments:

Post a Comment