Just in case you have this device contact your doctor for an evaluation of risks.
http://dgnews.docguide.com/label-use-device-prevent-stroke-patients-af-prevalent-dangerous?
The Lariat device, which has been cleared by the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for soft tissue approximation during surgical
procedures, is associated with a significant incidence of death and
urgent cardiac surgery during its frequent off-label use to prevent
stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Following a systematic review of case reports and an FDA safety
database, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School
of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, are calling for formal
controlled investigations into the safety and efficacy of off-label use
of the Lariat device, which has never been approved for treatment of
this condition.
Their findings are published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“Not only do we believe that high-quality, randomised clinical trials
are necessary to determine the safety of the Lariat device for
off-label procedures, but our analysis raises broader issues with the
FDA 510(k) clearance protocol for medical devices,” said senior author
Jay Giri, MD, University of Pennsylvania. “We believe there needs to be a
method for reassessing the safety of a device that has been cleared for
one use but is being frequently used for a different purpose in
real-world practice."
“The 510(k) clearance protocol is providing a regulatory loophole
that allows manufacturers to avoid full safety and efficacy testing of
devices cleared for one purpose, but used in practice for another
higher-risk application,” he said. “”In addition to the Lariat, this
issue could be important for other devices used in complex procedures
that have been cleared through the 510(k) pathway.”
The current study consisted of 2 sources: a systemic review of
published reports, and an analytic review of the FDA Manufacturer and
User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. For the systematic
review, the researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the
Cochrane Library for any reports of outcomes associated with the use of
the Lariat device for left atrial appendage exclusion.
The researchers found 7 cases of urgent need for cardiac surgery
following use of the device (2.3% of the 309 procedures reviewed) and 1
death (0.3% of the 309 procedures), with an overall procedural success
rate of 90.3%. The analytic review of the FDA MAUDE database identified 5
adverse event reports that noted death and another 23 reports of cases
necessitating urgent cardiac surgery.
“The Lariat is an ingenious piece of engineering for closing the left
atrial appendage, but ingenuity does not guarantee safety and
efficacy,” said Dr. Giri. “The Lariat must be assessed as a device for
left atrial appendage exclusion with randomised, controlled trials
before widespread use is adopted by the medical community.”
SOURCE: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,120 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke.DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER, BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment