The ASA blog response here: Nothing on solutions to the problem.
Cerebral microbleeds and thrombolysis for acute stroke: should we be concerned?
The abstract here:
- Pascal P. Gratz, MD*,
- Marwan El-Koussy, MD*,
- Kety Hsieh, MD,
- Sebastian von Arx, MD,
- Marie-Luise Mono, MD,
- Mirjam Rachel Heldner, MD,
- Urs Fischer, MD,
- Heinrich P. Mattle, MD,
- Christoph Zubler, MD,
- Gerhard Schroth, MD,
- Jan Gralla, MD,
- Marcel Arnold, MD* and
- Simon Jung, MD*
+ Author Affiliations
- Correspondence to Heinrich P. Mattle, MD, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail heinrich.mattle@insel.ch
-
↵* Drs Gratz, El-Koussy, Arnold, and Jung contributed equally.
Abstract
Background and Purpose—The
question whether cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) visible on MRI in acute
stroke increase the risk for intracerebral hemorrhages
(ICHs) or worse outcome after thrombolysis is
unresolved. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of CMB
detected
with pretreatment susceptibility-weighted MRI
on ICH occurrence and outcome.
Methods—From 2010
to 2013 we treated 724 patients with intravenous thrombolysis,
endovascular therapy, or intravenous thrombolysis
followed by endovascular therapy. A total of
392 of the 724 patients were examined with susceptibility-weighted MRI
before
treatment. CMBs were rated retrospectively.
Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the impact of
CMB on ICH
and outcome.
Results—Of 392
patients, 174 were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 150 with
endovascular therapy, and 68 with intravenous thrombolysis
followed by endovascular therapy. CMBs were
detected in 79 (20.2%) patients. Symptomatic ICH occurred in 21 (5.4%)
and asymptomatic
in 75 (19.1%) patients, thereof 61 (15.6%)
bleedings within and 35 (8.9%) outside the infarct. Neither the
existence of CMB,
their burden, predominant location nor their
presumed pathogenesis influenced the risk for symptomatic or
asymptomatic ICH.
A higher CMB burden marginally increased the
risk for ICH outside the infarct (P=0.048; odds ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 1.000–1.008).
Conclusions—CMB
detected on pretreatment susceptibility-weighted MRI did not increase
the risk for ICH or worsen outcome, even when CMB
burden, predominant location, or presumed
pathogenesis was considered. There was only a small increased risk for
ICH outside
the infarct with increasing CMB burden that
does not advise against thrombolysis in such patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment