http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2015.00165/full?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Neurology-w35-2015
- 1Neurorehabilitation and Recovery, Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 2School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 3Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 4Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 5Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Background: Distributed brain networks are
known to be involved in facilitating behavioral improvement after
stroke, yet few, if any, studies have investigated the relationship
between improved touch sensation after stroke and changes in functional
brain connectivity.
Objective: We aimed to identify how recovery
of somatosensory function in the first 6 months after stroke was
associated with functional network changes as measured using
resting-state connectivity analysis of functional magnetic resonance
imaging (fMRI) data.
Methods: Ten stroke survivors underwent
clinical testing and resting-state fMRI scans at 1 and 6 months
post-stroke. Ten age-matched healthy participants were included as
controls.
Results: Patients demonstrated a wide range of
severity of touch impairment 1 month post-stroke, followed by variable
improvement over time. In the stroke group, significantly stronger
interhemispheric functional correlations between regions of the
somatosensory system, and with visual and frontal areas, were found at 6
months than at 1 month post-stroke. Clinical improvement in touch
discrimination was associated with stronger correlations at 6 months
between contralesional secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) and inferior
parietal cortex and middle temporal gyrus, and between contralesional
thalamus and cerebellum.
Conclusion: The strength of connectivity
between somatosensory regions and distributed brain networks, including
vision and attention networks, may change over time in stroke survivors
with impaired touch discrimination. Connectivity changes from
contralesional SII and contralesional thalamus are associated with
improved touch sensation at 6 months post-stroke. These functional
connectivity changes could represent future targets for therapy.
Introduction
Somatosensory impairment is common after stroke, occurring in 50–80% of stroke survivors (1, 2). However, investigations of the neural correlates of clinical somatosensory improvement after stroke are scarce (3).
In particular, knowledge of how brain networks are interrupted is
limited, but is critical to better understand the nature of the clinical
deficit and post-stroke recovery (4).
Stroke impacts not only the focal lesion site but also on remote brain regions (5, 6).
Lesions have important remote effects on the function of connected
neural networks that are structurally intact, i.e., physiological
changes in distant but functionally related brain areas (4, 7, 8). These remote effects contribute significantly to the observed behavioral deficits and recovery potential (4, 8).
Further, changes in brain networks (across both hemispheres and
function-specific networks) have been shown to be important in recovery
of motor and attention functions (4, 6).
A significant challenge is to identify the brain networks and processes
that mediate functional improvement so that rehabilitation strategies
can be aimed at the appropriate targets (9).
Only a few studies have investigated changes in the brain over time in association with somatosensory recovery (3, 10–13).
These studies have primarily involved identification of brain regions
associated with task-related brain activation. A few studies have
reported that somatosensory recovery is associated with patterns of
activation in primary somatosensory (SI) cortex that resembles those
seen in healthy controls. For example, return of ipsilesional SI
activation has been shown to be associated with improved somatosensory
perception (10–12). Staines et al. (12)
found that enhanced primary somatosensory cortex activation using
functional MRI in the stroke-affected hemisphere occurred in conjunction
with improved touch detection in four patients with thalamocortical
strokes. Likewise, Wikström et al. (10)
reported that increased amplitude of early somatosensory evoked fields
in the ipsilesional SI in response to median nerve simulation was
associated with recovery of two-point discrimination (the ability to
discern that two nearby objects touching the skin are truly two distinct
points, not one) in stroke patients.
While relative “normalization” of brain activity in
primary and secondary (SII) somatosensory regions in both hemispheres
seems to underlie good clinical recovery, patients with more severe
impairments have been shown to recruit attention and multisensory brain
regions to a greater degree than that seen in healthy controls, in order
to accomplish successful task performance (3, 11, 14–17). In an early positron emission tomography (PET) study of five patients after subcortical stroke, Weder et al. (14)
reported activation across bilateral sensorimotor cortex and
distributed regions, such as premotor cortex and cerebellum, with worse
performance on a tactile shape discrimination task found to correlate
with bilateral sensorimotor cortex activation. Tecchio et al. (16)
used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to study 18 patients at the acute (5
days) and post-acute (6 months) stages after stroke. They reported that
excessive interhemispheric asymmetry correlated with a greater degree of
clinical improvement over time in those patients who showed partial
recovery. Taskin et al. (15)
reported reduced activation of ipsilesional SI with preserved
responsiveness of SII in six patients who had suffered thalamic strokes.
More recently, in 19 patients, a study into the relationship between
touch impairment and interruption to cortical and subcortical
somatosensory areas revealed that the neural correlates of touch
impairment in patients with interruption to subcortical somatosensory
areas (e.g., thalamus), involved a distributed network of ipsilesional
SI and SII, contralesional thalamus, and attention-related frontal and
occipital regions (3).
Use of task-based brain activation paradigms can be
challenging for stroke patients who may have difficulty performing a
given task, and inability to perform the task may impact on the validity
of the results (18).
Resting-state functional connectivity analysis of functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI) data has more recently been employed as a way
of assessing activity in the brain over time and across different
networks of the brain (19, 20).
Resting-state functional connectivity reveals intrinsic, spontaneous
networks that elucidate the functional architecture of the human brain
at rest (task-independent). Functional connectivity is defined as the
statistical association (or temporal correlation) among two or more
anatomically distinct regions (21).
Data are analyzed for coherence across the whole brain and/or in
relation to particular regions of interest (ROIs). Evidence suggests
that this measure is indicative of behaviorally relevant brain networks
without requiring task performance (22).
Consistent resting-state networks, with sharp transitions in
correlation patterns, are reliably detected in individual and group data
(23, 24).
In stroke patients, use of this technique has
revealed disruption of functional connectivity of brain networks, even
within structurally intact brain regions (6, 25, 26). Changes in functional connectivity have been described in motor recovery under resting-state and task-related conditions (27).
Further, changes in functional connectivity over time have been found
to occur in conjunction with behavioral change, both in healthy
individuals (22) and in stroke patients (7, 25). For example, He and colleagues (25)
reported that in patients with spatial neglect, dorsal attention
network connectivity was disrupted early after stroke, but appeared to
have improved to similar levels as controls by 9 months post-stroke, in
conjunction with behavioral improvement. This supports the
interpretation that different networks or areas of the brain may
dynamically change and assume different roles to allow behavior to
occur.
The aim of the current study was to identify
longitudinal changes in functional connections of the somatosensory
network in stroke patients with somatosensory impairment, and to
establish if and how these correlations are associated with improvement
in touch discrimination.
The importance of interhemispheric functional
connectivity in behavioral performance and recovery has been highlighted
from studies using resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) with animal and human
stroke populations (7, 25, 28).
The most consistent finding is of changes in interhemispheric
functional connectivity between homotopic areas, such as ipsilesional
and contralesional primary motor cortex (7).
Longitudinal changes have also been reported. Decreased
interhemispheric functional connectivity of the ipsilesional
sensorimotor cortex has been reported early after stroke, with return to
more normal levels during the recovery process (7, 29, 30). These findings are not surprising given that interhemispheric connections are implicated in sensory (31) and cognitive processing (32) and in models of motor and somatosensory recovery (33–37).
Thus, changes in interhemispheric functional connectivity in stroke
patients and associations between these changes and behavioral
improvement are expected. We hypothesized that over time, stroke
patients would exhibit return to a more “typical” pattern of
interhemispheric functional connectivity between homologous cortical
somatosensory regions, and that stronger interhemispheric resting-state
functional correlations between homologous SI and SII regions at 6
months than at 1 month post-stroke would be associated with clinical
improvement.
Increased connectivity with distributed networks has
also been reported in recovery after stroke. First, the visual system
drives human attention and planning (38, 39), and a rich history of evidence for cross-modal plasticity between the visual and somatosensory systems exists (40). Recruitment of visual areas has been reported in previous studies of motor recovery after stroke (30, 41) as well as in patients with somatosensory impairment after stroke (3). Second, greater recruitment of attention systems is known to be necessary (42) to compensate for the impairment of function-specific brain areas due to aging or injury (43, 44).
In stroke patients, increased attention has been shown to be required
to accomplish previously simple tasks, such as walking, and attention
skills have been shown to predict outcome after stroke (42, 45).
Increased activation of frontoparietal attention areas, such as
inferior parietal cortex (IPC), has been reported to occur in recovering
stroke patients with motor problems (46–48).
Thus, greater functional connections with frontoparietal attention
networks could be expected in stroke patients with somatosensory
impairment. As such, we predicted that stronger thalamocortical and
cortico-cortical functional correlations with frontoparietal visual
attention networks at 6 months post-stroke would be associated with
clinical improvement.
More at link, not that it will help any survivor.
No comments:
Post a Comment