Mirror training has been considered useful since at least 1999. I've written 30 posts on mirror therapy since 2012. But since nobody is listening to me, nothing has been done about writing a fucking simple stroke protocol on this. Do not do this on your own, way too dangerous.
Reflections on Mirror Therapy A Systematic Review of the Effect of Mirror Visual Feedback on the Brain
- Frederik J. A. Deconinck, PhD1,2
- Ana R. P. Smorenburg, PhD3
- Alex Benham, PhD4
- Annick Ledebt, PhD5
- Max G. Feltham, PhD6
- Geert J. P. Savelsbergh, PhD5
- 1Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- 2Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
- 3Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY, USA
- 4Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
- 5VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 6University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Frederik J. A. Deconinck, Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Watersportlaan 2, Gent 9000, Belgium. Email: Frederik.Deconinck@UGent.be
Abstract
Background. Mirror visual feedback (MVF), a
phenomenon where movement of one limb is perceived as movement of the
other limb, has the
capacity to alleviate phantom limb pain or promote
motor recovery of the upper limbs after stroke. The tool has received
great
interest from health professionals; however, a
clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying the neural recovery
owing
to MVF is lacking.
Objective. We performed a systematic review to assess the effect of MVF on brain activation during a motor task. Methods. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for neuroimaging studies investigating the effect of MVF on the brain.
Key details for each study regarding participants, imaging methods, and results were extracted.
Results.
The database search yielded 347 article, of which we identified 33
suitable for inclusion. Compared with a control condition,
MVF increases neural activity in areas involved
with allocation of attention and cognitive control (dorsolateral
prefrontal
cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, S1 and S2,
precuneus). Apart from activation in the superior temporal gyrus and
premotor
cortex, there is little evidence that MVF activates
the mirror neuron system. MVF increases the excitability of the
ipsilateral
primary motor cortex (M1) that projects to the
“untrained” hand/arm. There is also evidence for ipsilateral projections
from
the contralateral M1 to the untrained/affected hand
as a consequence of training with MVF.
Conclusion. MVF can
exert a strong influence on the motor network, mainly through increased
cognitive penetration in action control,
though the variance in methodology and the lack of
studies that shed light on the functional connectivity between areas
still
limit insight into the actual underlying
mechanisms.
Introduction
Often a source of fascination, or perhaps
frustration, optical illusions have captivated people since ancient
times. For instance,
curved surfaces and the absence of right angles in
archaic Greek temples suggest that its architects attempted to optically
correct the illusion of slanted columns or curved
tympanums; however, others believe these features may serve engineering
purposes or reflect aesthetic preference.1 As much as they are a source of excitement, for neuroscientists optical illusions are considered a backdoor into people’s
mind and provide an excellent way to study the neural mechanisms underlying perception and action.2
Interestingly, although optical illusions
are known to deceive the individual, the false reality may fool the
brain, such
that the outcome is beneficial. One such an
illusion is the mirror illusion, which has been found to have
therapeutic benefits
over the past 2 decades. When a mirror is placed,
along the midsagittal plane in between the 2 limbs, the reflection of
the
limb in front of the mirror is superimposed on the
contralateral limb. Any motion of the limb in front of the mirror
induces
the illusion of 2 synchronously moving limbs. After
Ramachandran and his colleagues found that this illusion could
alleviate
phantom pain in a proportion of the patients,3
mirror visual feedback (MVF) was introduced as a neurorehabilitation
tool to treat other unilateral pain disorders, such
as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). In
addition, the paradigm is now used to promote motor recovery (eg, in
hemiparetic
patients or after hand surgery).
Despite its widespread use in
neurorehabilitation and the claims that MVF therapy would lead to
neuroplastic changes, there
is no consensus about the underlying mechanism and
speculation often lacks the neuroscientific proof. The aim of this
review
is therefore to bring together current knowledge on
the effect of MVF on the brain as has been described in neuroimaging
studies,
in order to explore potential processes underlying
the beneficial clinical effects of MVF. To acquaint the reader with MVF
and its current applications, we will first revisit
Ramachandran’s rationale for MVF, followed by a narrative review of the
clinical neurorehabilitation research that followed
in his footsteps. At the end of this section, we introduce 3 hypotheses
that have been proposed to explain the positive
effects related to MVF. Part 2 provides a systematic review and
discussion
of studies that examined the effect of MVF on brain
activation patterns using neuroimaging or electrophysiological
techniques.
Finally, in Part 3 we discuss the findings of the
systematic review in relation to the hypotheses introduced in Part 1 and
we identify where further research is required.
No comments:
Post a Comment