Effect of a mixed reality-based intervention on arm, hand, and finger function on chronic stroke

Don't worry, this will never come to fruition in your lifetime, or your childrens' lifetime, or your grandchildrens' lifetime.

Effect of a mixed reality-based intervention on arm, hand, and finger function on chronic stroke

• Carolina Colomer,
• Roberto LlorensEmail author,
• Enrique Noé and
• Mariano Alcañiz

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation201613:45

DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0153-6

©  Colomer et al. 2016

Received: 9 July 2015

Accepted: 3 May 2016

Published: 11 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Virtual and mixed reality systems have been suggested to promote motor recovery after stroke. Basing on the existing evidence on motor learning, we have developed a portable and low-cost mixed reality tabletop system that transforms a conventional table in a virtual environment for upper limb rehabilitation. The system allows intensive and customized training of a wide range of arm, hand, and finger movements and enables interaction with tangible objects, while providing audiovisual feedback of the participants’ performance in gamified tasks. This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness and the acceptance of an experimental intervention with the system in chronic stroke survivors.

Methods

Thirty individuals with stroke were included in a reversal (A-B-A) study. Phase A consisted of 30 sessions of conventional physical therapy. Phase B consisted of 30 training sessions with the experimental system. Both interventions involved flexion and extension of the elbow, wrist, and fingers, and grasping of different objects. Sessions were 45-min long and were administered three to five days a week. The body structures (Modified Ashworth Scale), functions (Motricity Index, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale), activities (Manual Function Test, Wolf Motor Function Test, Box and Blocks Test, Nine Hole Peg Test), and participation (Motor Activity Log) were assessed before and after each phase. Acceptance of the system was also assessed after phase B (System Usability Scale, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory).

Results

Significant improvement was detected after the intervention with the system in the activity, both in arm function measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (p < 0.01) and finger dexterity measured by the Box and Blocks Test (p < 0.01) and the Nine Hole Peg Test (p < 0.01); and participation (p  < 0.01), which was maintained to the end of the study. The experimental system was reported as highly usable, enjoyable, and motivating.

Conclusions

Our results support the clinical effectiveness of mixed reality interventions that satisfy the motor learning principles for upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors. This characteristic, together with the low cost of the system, its portability, and its acceptance could promote the integration of these systems in the clinical practice as an alternative to more expensive systems, such as robotic instruments.