Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, September 11, 2017

Poststroke Fatigue: Emerging Evidence and Approaches to Management: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

They're being incredibly lazy by just working on 'managing' fatigue, NOT curing fatigue. So 4-5  millions stroke survivors have fatigue each year with absolutely NO solution. Start screaming at your doctor and hospital president about their incompetency in not getting this solved. They've known about it for decades. 
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/48/7/e159.long
Janice L. Hinkle, Kyra J. Becker, Jong S. Kim, Smi Choi-Kwon, Karen L. Saban, Norma McNair, Gillian E. Mead
and on behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing and Stroke Council

Abstract

At least half of all stroke survivors experience fatigue; thus, it is a common cause of concern for patients, caregivers, and clinicians after stroke. This scientific statement provides an international perspective on the emerging evidence surrounding the incidence, prevalence, quality of life, and complex pathogenesis of poststroke fatigue. Evidence for pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for management are reviewed, as well as the effects of poststroke fatigue on both stroke survivors and caregivers.
Fatigue is a common and often debilitating sequela of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Globally, there are ≈33 million stroke survivors,1 and at least half of these individuals experience fatigue.2 The goal of this scientific statement is to provide an international perspective on the current understanding of the incidence, prevalence, quality of life (QOL), and complex pathogenesis of poststroke fatigue (PSF). Potential pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to management are explored, as well as the effects of PSF on both stroke survivors and caregivers.

Methods

A critical analysis of published quantitative research and guidelines on fatigue after stroke was conducted. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Search terms included poststroke fatigue, fatigue, chronic fatigue, incidence, prevalence, caregiver, biomarker, etiology, intervention, patient education materials, and pharmacological interventions. Analysis involved reviewing titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for relevance to the topic with the following inclusion criteria: (1) written in the English language; (2) involved human subjects; (3) published from January 2000 through March 2016; (4) used a quasi-experimental, experimental, observational research or randomized clinical trial (RCT) design; (5) involved the subject of fatigue after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; and (6) was conducted during any part of the stroke continuum of care (acute hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation, homecare, long-term care). Additional quantitative research was identified from the reference lists of publications found with the search criteria listed above.

Overview of PSF

There are many ways in which fatigue is defined and measured. These varying definitions affect the estimates of the incidence and prevalence of PSF. None of the current definitions of PSF are specific to stroke. The most commonly used definitions include the following:
  • “Subjective lack of physical and/or mental energy that is perceived by the individual or caregiver to interfere with usual and desired activities.”3
  • “A feeling of early exhaustion developing during mental activity, with weariness, lack of energy, and aversion to effort.”4
  • “Sense of exhaustion, lack of perceived energy or tiredness, distinct from sadness or weakness.”5
These definitions may include both physical and mental energy or be limited only to mental activity. In recent years. fatigue has come to be distinguished from symptoms of depression. but there is no consensus among clinicians or researchers on one definition of PSF.
Given the many and differing definitions of fatigue, estimates of its incidence (first reported fatigue related to stroke onset) and prevalence (number of stroke survivors experiencing fatigue at any given point in time) vary. Reliable reports of incidence are not available in the literature. One of the earliest studies on PSF estimated the incidence to be 75%.6 This study, however, did not provide a definition of fatigue and evaluated only 44 individuals who were 3 to 24 months after stroke and thus likely gives a better estimate of prevalence than incidence. In reviews, prevalence estimates for PSF range from 23% to 77%.711 Because of the varying definitions and scales used, meta-analyses are limited. One systematic review of individuals with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke estimated the pooled prevalence of PSF to be between 23% and 34%.7 Another systematic review that included 49 studies reported prevalence rates between 25% and 85%.12 Although no data were reported on stroke severity, with >3000 subjects represented in the review, it can be assumed that more than transient ischemic attacks and minor strokes were represented, which could be one possible explanation of the wide prevalence.
Lynch and colleagues13 created case definitions of PSF based on interviews with stroke survivors in the initial and recovery stages. These definitions are as follows:
For hospital patients: Since their stroke, the patient has experienced fatigue, a lack of energy, or an increased need to rest every day or nearly every day. And this fatigue has led to difficulty taking part in everyday activities (for inpatients this may include therapy and may include the need to terminate an activity early because of fatigue).... For community-dwelling patients: Over the past month, there has been at least a 2 week period when patient has experienced fatigue, a lack of energy, or an increased need to rest every day or nearly every day. And this fatigue has led to difficulty taking part in everyday activities.13
With this definition, the prevalence of PSF was estimated to be 40% after stroke.13 PSF was associated with female sex and emotional distress.13
In summary, there is no consensus among clinicians or researchers on one best definition of PSF. A consensus definition would lead to more accurate estimates of incidence and prevalence.

Much more at link. 

No comments:

Post a Comment