Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,859 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke. DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain!trillions and trillions of neuronsthatDIEeach day because there areNOeffective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Monday, May 27, 2019
Wireless Recording in the Peripheral Nervous System with Ultrasonic Neural Dust
With ANY BRAINS AT ALL in stroke leadership,
this would have immediately started research using this to listen in on
neuron signalling in neuroplasticity. We need to know why and how a
neighboring neuron gives up its current task and takes on a neighboring
task. Without that knowledge neuroplasticity will never be made
repeatable and made into a stroke protocol. Hell, this has been out
since October 2016 so more proof that the stroke medical world is
completely incompetent.
First in vivo electrophysiological recordings with neural dust motes
•
Passive, wireless, and battery-less EMG and ENG recording with mm-scale devices
•
Recorded signals transmitted via ultrasonic backscatter from implanted neural dust motes
•
Ultrasound as a scalable means of providing wireless power and communication
Summary
The
emerging field of bioelectronic medicine seeks methods for deciphering
and modulating electrophysiological activity in the body to attain
therapeutic effects at target organs. Current approaches to interfacing
with peripheral nerves and muscles rely heavily on wires, creating
problems for chronic use, while emerging wireless approaches lack the
size scalability necessary to interrogate small-diameter nerves.
Furthermore, conventional electrode-based technologies lack the
capability to record from nerves with high spatial resolution or to
record independently from many discrete sites within a nerve bundle.
Here, we demonstrate neural dust, a wireless and scalable ultrasonic
backscatter system for powering and communicating with implanted
bioelectronics. We show that ultrasound is effective at delivering power
to mm-scale devices in tissue; likewise, passive, battery-less
communication using backscatter enables high-fidelity transmission of
electromyogram (EMG) and electroneurogram (ENG) signals from
anesthetized rats. These results highlight the potential for an
ultrasound-based neural interface system for advancing future
bioelectronics-based therapies.
)
have renewed interest in implantable systems for interfacing with the
peripheral nervous system. Early clinical successes with peripheral
neurostimulation devices, such as those used to treat sleep apnea (
).
A recently proposed roadmap for the field of bioelectronic medicines
highlights the need for new electrode-based recording technologies that
can detect abnormalities in physiological signals and be used to update
stimulation parameters in real time. Key features of such technologies
include high-density, stable recordings of up to 100 channels in single
nerves, wireless and implantable modules to enable characterization of
functionally specific neural and electromyographic signals, and scalable
device platforms that can interface with small nerves of 100 μm
diameter or less (
)
as well as specific muscle fibers. Current approaches to recording
peripheral nerve activity fall short of this goal; for example, cuff
electrodes provide stable chronic performance but are limited to
recording compound activity from the entire nerve. Single-lead
intrafascicular electrodes can record from multiple sites within a
single fascicle but do not enable high-density recording from discrete
sites in multiple fascicles (
).
However, most wireless systems use electromagnetic (EM) energy coupling
and communication, which becomes extremely inefficient in systems
smaller than ∼5 mm due to the inefficiency of coupling radio waves at
these scales within tissue (
; see also Size Scaling and Electromagnetics in the Supplemental Information).
Further miniaturization of wireless electronics platforms that can
effectively interface with small-diameter nerves will require new
approaches.
In contrast to EM,
ultrasound offers an attractive alternative for wirelessly powering and
communicating with sub-mm implantable devices (
). Ultrasound has two advantages. First, the speed of sound is 105
× lower than the speed of light in water, leading to much smaller
wavelengths at similar frequencies; this yields excellent spatial
resolution at these lower frequencies as compared to radio waves.
Second, ultrasonic energy attenuates far less in tissue than EM
radiation; this not only results in much higher penetration depths for a
given power, but also significantly decreases the amount of unwanted
power introduced into tissue due to scattering or absorption. In fact,
for most frequencies and power levels, ultrasound is safe in the human
body. These limits are well defined, and ultrasound technologies have
long been used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. As a rough
guide, about 72× more power is allowable into the human body when using
ultrasound as compared to radio waves (
We previously introduced the neural dust
ultrasonic backscattering concept to harness the potential advantages
of ultrasound and showed that, theoretically, such a system could be
scaled well below the mm-scale when used for wireless
electrophysiological neural recording (
).
Here, we present the first experimental validation of a neural dust
system in vivo in the rat peripheral nervous system (PNS) and skeletal
muscle, reporting both electroneurogram (ENG) recordings from the
sciatic nerve and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the
gastrocnemius muscle. The neural dust system consists of an external
ultrasonic transceiver board which powers and communicates with a
millimeter-scale sensor implanted into either a nerve or muscle (Figure 1A). The implanted mote consists of a piezoelectric crystal, a single custom transistor, and a pair of recording electrodes (Figures 1B, 1C, and S1).
No comments:
Post a Comment