Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Numbers and Words: Saving Your Aging Brain

How many decades have to pass before your hospital buys Sudoku puzzles for every stroke survivor? Or will they wait forever because

SOMEONE ELSE WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM?

And tell them what to do? That would be such a fucking display of incompetence that the whole stroke hospital and the board of directors needs to be removed. 

Numbers and Words: Saving Your Aging Brain

New research suggests you need to “use it or lose it.” Can puzzles help?

Google Platinum Blonde is you want the hardest sudoku puzzle created. 

Posted May 25, 2019


Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay, used with permission.
Puzzles may do more than entertain us.
Source: Ben_Kerckx/Pixabay, used with permission.
It may seem like a no-brainer, but the effects of brain training—using tools like word and number games to enhance cognitive performance—are actually quite controversial. That’s because the broader and long-term benefits of brain training have yet to be determined. There are many questions: Do word and number games actually enhance your brain, or do you just get better at doing puzzles? Do such puzzles help keep your brain working better overall for a longer period of time? Researchers are setting out to find more definitive answers, one way or another.
Using data collected online from more than 19,000 study participants ages 50 to 93, researchers at University of Exeter Medical School in the U.K. found that those who regularly played number games like Sudoko had significantly higher cognition function than those who played fewer or none at all. The brain functioning skills tested included reasoning, attention/focus, information processing, executive function, working memory, and episodic memory.
The study, published in print in the May 2019 issue of the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, piggybacks on research published last year by the same researchers on the cognitive benefits of doing word puzzles, such as crosswords. In both cases, the researchers found that the more often participants worked on the puzzles, the better they did on tests that assessed their attention, reasoning, and memory capabilities. In the case of number puzzles, the researchers found that those participants who reportedly did number puzzles more than once a day scored highest on all cognitive functions tested than any other group. Overall, speed and accuracy were most notably improved.
A 2016 article published in Nature reviewed various theories and studies of brain training and came up with conflicting results and mixed reviews. While many studies seem to show real benefits from training, skeptics say there may be nothing more to it than there is to practicing anything to get better at it. They question whether or not specific types of brain training used in these types of studies  actually improve cognition in other areas and under other circumstances. They also question whether or not the range of activities used to test cognition is broad enough to accurately measure the outcome and its significance.
Research like these recently published word and number puzzle studies heed the call from skeptics for larger and stronger studies on the effects of brain training. Many questions remain on the relationship between working memory and intelligence, for instance, and on the long-term and overall benefits of braining training. Researchers around the world are teaming up to engage in more rigorous studies wherein new ideas and methods for brain training will be explored and shared.
Meanwhile, most studies end with rationales for further research and the Exeter studies are no exception. While this latest study looked at how often participants played number puzzles, just as the previous study looked at the frequency of engaging in word puzzles, the researchers are planning future studies to help them determine if and how the specific type and difficulty of puzzles influences brain function in aging adults. 
References
Brooker H, Wesnes KA, Ballard C, et al. The relationship between the frequency of number-puzzle use and baseline cognitive function in a large online sample of adults aged 50 and over. Geriatric Psychiatry. First published online February 11, 2019.
Brooker H, Wesnes KA, Ballard C, et al. An online investigation of the relationship between the frequency of word puzzle use and cognitive function in a large online sample of older adults. Geriatric Psychiatry. First published online February 15, 2018.
Makin S. Brain training: Memory games. Nature. March 3, 2016. S10-S11

No comments:

Post a Comment