I was tested in one of these called a Balance Master 4 weeks post-stroke. The force plates I was standing on could move side to side, front to back and tilt in various directions, all the while the three sides; front of you and each side were moving around. You were strapped into a harness to catch you when you fall. After it was all done my PT ran my scores thru the universe of results and at that time my age of 50 results were better than the average 50 year old male. Luckily when I've fallen my left hip was strong enough not to break, but then I take insane chances in life.
Analysis of Brain Lesion Impact on Balance and Gait Following Stroke
- 1Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- 2Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Ra’anana, Israel
- 3Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Introduction
Falls occur in up to 70% of stroke victims during the first 6 months after discharge from hospital or rehabilitation setting (Forster and Young, 1995; Davenport et al., 1996; Weerdesteyn et al., 2008; Batchelor et al., 2012).
Compared with a general population of older adults who fall, persons
with stroke (PwS) who fall are twice as likely to sustain a hip fracture
(Forster and Young, 1995; Langhorne et al., 2000; Pouwels et al., 2009; Winstein et al., 2016).
In addition to physical consequences associated with fractures and
related injuries, falls may have serious psychological and social
consequences such as functional decline, poor quality of life,
dependency, social isolation and depression (Winstein et al., 2016).
Balance control is a strong predictor of functional recovery, walking capacity and fall risk after stroke (Michael et al., 2005; Belgen et al., 2006; Simpson et al., 2011; van Duijnhoven et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2018).
Commonly used clinical measures [e.g., the Berg Balance Scale (BBS),
Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and Timed Up and Go (TUG)] focus on
anticipatory balance control, that is essential for the maintenance of
postural stability prior to voluntary movement by compensating for
destabilizing forces associated with the movement. However, in
situations of unexpected loss of balance, the ability to respond
effectively (i.e., reactive balance control), is crucial for fall
prevention (Maki and McIlroy, 1997).
After small external disturbances, we can usually regain balance while
keeping the feet in place. However, falls often occur from large
external disturbances (Maki and McIlroy, 2006)
which require a rapid step response to alter the base of support.
Recent studies assessed reactive balance control abilities by exposure
to external perturbations delivered from a movable platform (Salot et al., 2015; Honeycutt et al., 2016; de Kam et al., 2017).
In this paradigm, the time, direction and intensity of perturbation is
unpredicted, thus simulating situations in real life where loss of
balance is unexpected. PwS have shown substantially impaired reactive
balance responses compared to healthy individuals, characterized by
increased need for external assistance, difficulty initiating protective
stepping with either lower limb, increased usage of multiple step
strategy, and more falls into the harness system (Marigold and Eng, 2006; Mansfield et al., 2013; Martinez et al., 2013; Inness et al., 2014; Salot et al., 2015; Honeycutt et al., 2016; de Kam et al., 2017).
Although impairments in balance control following stroke
have been studied extensively and their impact on the risk of falls and
fractures has been established, relatively few studies have explored
the associations between these impairments and damage to specific brain
structures. Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) is a commonly used
method for analyses of the neural basis underlying different types of
impairment described by Bates et al. (2003).
Use of VLSM for analysis of lesion characteristics in lower-limb
paresis, gait instability and impaired balance, is much less prevalent
compared with its use in analyses focusing on the hemiparetic upper
limb. Using VLSM, Reynolds et al. (2014)
found that lower BBS scores were associated with damage in the
precentral gyrus, putamen, caudate and pallidum, cuneus, frontal
operculum, and also damage to some thalamic structures. They also found
that TUG scores were associated with lesions in the postcentral gyrus,
insular cortex, superior temporal cortex, and the inferior parietal
lobule. Lee et al. (2017)
found that lesions involving the corona radiata, internal capsule,
globus pallidus, putamen, primary motor cortex and caudate nucleus are
associated with poor recovery of gait, as measured with the functional
ambulation category (FAC) 6 months after stroke onset. In contradiction
to the above findings, Moon et al. (2016)
found no specific lesion locations in association with poor BBS and FAC
scores. Poor gait speed was found to associate with damage to the
putamen, insula, caudate, corona radiata and external capsule (EC; Reynolds et al., 2014; Jones et al., 2016). Alexander et al. (2009)
found that damage to the putamen, insula and EC was related to gait
asymmetry in chronic PwS. Lower Extremity Fugl-Meyer (LEFM) scores were
found to be associated with damage in the corona radiata, putamen,
globus pallidus, caudate, insula and internal capsule (Reynolds et al., 2014; Moon et al., 2016).
Lesion studies investigating the effects of stroke
location on motor ability often address the right and left hemispheres
as two parallel and analogous systems, and flip lesions onto a single
hemisphere template (Lo et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2010; Cheng et al., 2014; Meyer et al., 2015).
This practice may obscure important differences between the
hemispheres. A recent VLSM study showed that LEFM scores are affected by
a wider lesion distribution in the left hemisphere compared to the
right hemisphere (Moon et al., 2016). In contrast, a post hoc VLSM analysis aimed to assess hemispheric effects (Jones et al., 2016),
revealed no “significant” voxel clusters in either hemisphere.
Considering the relative paucity of studies addressing lesion effects on
balance control and gait and the fact that most of the existing studies
did not analyze right and left hemisphere damage separately, our
objective in the current study was to explore the impact of lesion
location, in each hemisphere, on reactive and anticipatory balance
capacity, gait, and hemiparetic lower limb function, in PwS.
More at link.
No comments:
Post a Comment