Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Lower Limb Ischaemic Per-Conditioning Does Not Reduce Final Infarct Size in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

But what about these lower limb interventions? Does your doctor know of them? 

Leg compressions may enhance stroke recovery August 2012

Leg wraps raise hopes of saved lives after strokes May 2013 

Your doctor and hospital not knowing and implementing these easy interventions is the very pinnacle of incompetence.

 

Lower Limb Ischaemic Per-Conditioning Does Not Reduce Final Infarct Size in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

MILAN, Italy -- May 24, 2019 -- In-hospital remote ischaemic per-conditioning (per-CID) within 6 hours is safe, but shows no benefits over sham procedure for patients with confirmed acute ischaemic stroke undergoing thrombolysis, according to a study presented here at the 5th European Stroke Organisation Conference (ESOC).

The findings, presented by Fernando Pico, MD, Versailles Mignot Hospital, Versailles, France, come from the Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Brain Infarction Study (RESCUE-BRAIN) trial.

per-CID was designed to cause transient limb ischaemia to induce ischaemic tolerance and promote endogenous mechanisms to increase cerebral blood flow. per-CID showed a cardioprotective effect in a randomised control trial involving 250 patients within the 6 first hours of myocardial infarction who were candidates for primary angioplasty.

“In cardiology, for myocardial infarction, one study showed that ischaemic conditioning reduces the size of the myocardial lesion,” said Dr. Pico.

Therefore, the researchers wanted to determine whether per-CID in the unaffected lower limb performed within the first 6 hours of cerebral infarction could reduce the growth of the brain infarction.

For the current study, 93 patients with MRI-confirmed carotid ischaemic stroke received a lower limb tourniquet on half of the thigh within 6 hours of symptom onset. The per-conditioning protocol consists of 4 cycles of electronic tourniquet inflation (5 minutes) and deflation (5 minutes) to the thigh over 40 minutes. Another 95 patients had a sham cuff placed. MRI was repeated 24 hours after stroke onset.

Around 90% of patients had been treated with intravenous thrombolysis (median time, 2.5 hours) and about a third had undergone endovascular treatment (median time, 3.2 hours). Median time between stroke onset and cuff inflation was 3.7 hours.

The primary outcome was changes in diffusion-weighted imaging brain infarction volume between baseline and 24 hours.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between groups in final infarct size (mean log10 change, 0.37 vs 0.30 and median percentage change in brain infarction volume, 34.1% vs 36.5%).

Similarly, there were no significant differences for secondary endpoints of change in NIHSS score at 24 hours, 90-day Bathel ≥95, and 90-day modified Rankin score 0-1.

“RESCUE BRAIN is a neutral randomised controlled trial, with no benefit, but not harmful,” said Dr. Pico.

[Presentation title: A French Multicenter Randomized Trial on Neuroprotection With Lower Limb Ischemic Per-Conditioning in the Acute Phase of Cerebral Infarction]

No comments:

Post a Comment