http://www.neurology.org/content/81/9/812.abstract?sid=7b7456af-c9a4-4426-b8f6-4cae6e552b3d
- Paul Rinne, MSc,
- Mursyida Hassan, MSc,
- Despina Goniotakis, MSc,
- Kiran Chohan, DPhil,
- Pankaj Sharma, MD, FRCP, PhD,
- Dawn Langdon, PhD,
- David Soto, PhD and
- Paul Bentley, MRCP, PhD
- Correspondence to Dr. Bentley: p.bentley@imperial.ac.uk
-
August 27, 2013 vol. 81 no. 9 812-820Neurology
- Abstract
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Also available:
- Figures Only
- Data Supplement
- Accompanying Editorial
- PPT Slides of All Figures
Abstract
Objective: To
determine whether behavioral dissociations and interactions occur
between the attentional functions—alerting, orienting,
and conflict resolution—depending upon stroke
location and to determine the approximate proportion of patients who can
be
classified into 1 of these 3 anatomical
networks.
Methods: We
recruited 110 anatomically unselected acute stroke patients and 62
age-matched controls. Subjects underwent the attention
network test (ANT), which provides a measure of
each attention type. Their performance was related to lesion anatomy on
MRI
using a voxel-lesion mapping approach.
Results: Patients as
a whole performed poorer than controls, but there were no group
differences in the size of attentional effects.
Specific deficits in 1 of the 3 ANT-tested
functions were found in the following lesion locations: alerting
deficiency with
bilateral anteromedial thalamus and upper
brainstem (17% of patients); orienting impairment with right pulvinar
and right
temporoparietal cortex (15%); conflict
resolution with bilateral prefrontal and premotor areas (23%). Lesions
to right frontoparietal
regions also modified interactions among the 3
types of attention.
Conclusions: More
than half of all stroke patients can be expected to have a lesion
location classifiable into 1 of the 3 principal attention
networks. Our results have potential
implications for therapy personalization in focal brain diseases
including stroke.
No comments:
Post a Comment