Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Effectiveness of a therapeutic Tai Ji Quan intervention vs a multimodal exercise intervention to prevent falls among older adults at high risk of falling: A randomized clinical trial

Does your stroke hospital even have a fall prevention protocol?  I had none, I was obviously expected never to fall, no training on what to do to get up off the ground. But with no group that tested out recovering from perturbations more research needs to be done.
https://www.mdlinx.com/journal-summaries/trauma-tai-ji-quan-exercise-geriatrics/2018/09/12/7544162/ZZ3559DFF1FDFD43F3965FF05AF76C7B18?

JAMA Internal MedicineLi F, et al. | September 12, 2018
Researchers conducted a single-blind, three-arm, parallel-design, randomized clinical trial to ascertain the effectiveness of a therapeutically tailored tai ji quan intervention, Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance (TJQMBB), and a multimodal exercise (MME) program relative to stretching exercise in reducing falls among older adults at high risk of falling. Results showed that, compared with conventional exercise approaches, a therapeutically tailored tai ji quan intervention was more effective in reducing the incidence of falls in this study population.

Methods

  • This trial was conducted in seven urban and suburban cities in Oregon from February 20, 2015, to January 30, 2018.
  • Researchers screened 1,147 community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years for eligibility; of these, 670 who had fallen in the preceding year or had impaired mobility consented and were enrolled.
  • Intention-to-treat assignment was used in all analyses.
  • Interventions included 1 of 3 exercise interventions: two 60-minute classes weekly for 24 weeks of TJQMBB, entailing modified forms and therapeutic movement exercises; MME, integrating balance, aerobics, strength, and flexibility activities; or stretching exercises.
  • Incidence of falls at 6 months was the primary measure.

Results

  • Researchers randomized 670 adults (mean [standard deviation] age: 77.7 [5.6] years), of whom 436 (65%) were women, 617 (92.1%) were white, and 31 (4.6%) were African American.
  • During the trial, the TJQMBB group had 152 falls (85 individuals), the MME group had 218 falls (112 individuals), and the stretching-exercise group had 363 falls (127 individuals).
  • At 6 months, significantly lower incidence rate ratio (IRR) was observed in the TJQMBB (IRR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.56; P < 0 .001) and MME groups (IRR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45-0.80; P=0.001) vs the stretching group.
  • Falls were reduced by 31% for the TJQMBB group vs the MME group (IRR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.94; P=0.01).
Read the full article on JAMA Internal Medicine

No comments:

Post a Comment