Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Added-value of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Reduction during Arm-hand Rehabilitation in Improving Functional Arm-hand Skill Performance: A Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design Study

Later in the article they talk about stratifying the patients so they once again cherry pick to only address the easiest cases. Fucking lazy assholes. I expect 100% recovery for ALL. The mentors and senior researchers should be keel hauled for proposing such simplistic research.

Added-value of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Reduction during Arm-hand Rehabilitation in Improving Functional Arm-hand Skill Performance: A Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design Study


International Journal of Neurorehabilitation ISSN: 2376-0281 International Journal of Neurorehabilitation Franck et al., Int J Neurorehabilitation Eng 2018, 5:4 DOI: 10.4172/2376-0281.1000323 Open Access Research Article Volume 5 • Issue 4 • 1000323 Int J Neurorehabilitation, an open access journal ISSN: 2376-0281 *Corresponding author: Johan Anton Franck, Adelante Rehabilitation Centre, Hoensbroek, Netherlands, Tel: +31647155506; E-mail: h.franck@adelante-zorggroep.nl Received July 13, 2018; Accepted August 24, 2018;
Published August 31, 2018 Citation: Franck JA, Smeets RJEM, Renders K, Seelen HAM (2018) Added- value of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Reduction during Arm-hand Rehabilitation in Improving Functional Arm-hand Skill Performance: A Multiple Baseline Single Case Experimental Design Study. Int J Neurorehabilitation 5: 323. doi: 10.4172/2376- 0281. 1000323 Copyright: © 2018 Franck JA, et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background: Focal spasticity management in patients in the sub-acute phase after a stroke is mainly based on expert opinion. Evidence for the optimal type and intensity of multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs is scarce. This study will investigate the added-value of reduction of early signs of spasticity in the sub-acute phase after stroke on arm-hand rehabilitation outcome involving a well-described rehabilitation intervention. Reduction of early signs of spasticity will be done using abobotulinum toxin A.
Methods/design: This study comprises three methodological approaches, i.e.: i) a (multiple baseline) single case experimental design involving 10 individuals; ii) a meta-analysis of the data of all single cases (single armed group design); iii) non-randomized double armed group design, i.e. a case-matched control design in which each patient receiving early post-stroke spasticity reduction treatment will be matched (according to arm-hand capacity, spasticity level, age, gender, and Utrechtse Arm-hand Test scores) to a case from a prospective cohort study on changes in arm- hand status in 89 stroke patients performed previously. Improvement of arm-hand skill performance will be gauged using: a) the Action Research Arm Test, gauging functional capacity; b) the ABILHAND, gauging perceived level of arm-hand skill proficiency; and c) bilateral arm accelerometry, gauging actual arm-hand skill performance in daily life. Furthermore, arm-hand function will be measured using: a) Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment; b) hand-held dynamometry (grip strength); c) Motricity Index (functional strength); and d) Modified Ashworth Scale (spasticity levels in the upper extremity). Statistical analyses include permutation tests involving the time series of each subject separately, Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests.
Discussion:
Results of this study will provide evidence on the added-value of reduction of early signs of spasticity
in the upper extremity on functional arm-hand skill performance in sub-acute stroke patients with either a severely or
moderately affected arm-hand and moderate to severe grades of spasticity.

No comments:

Post a Comment