Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, November 22, 2019

Intravenous Thrombolysis Administration 3–4.5 h After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

Did the patients say they were 100% recovered?  I don't trust raters and the Rankin scale. What are you doing about the 66% of patients that did not get (mRS) 0–1? I'd say a 66% failure rate is failure.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Administration 3–4.5 h After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study

Yu-Wei Chen1,2, Sheng-Feng Sung3, Chih-Hung Chen4, Sung-Chun Tang2, Li-Kai Tsai2, Huey-Juan Lin5, Hung-Yu Huang6, Helen L. Po7, Yu Sun8, Po-Lin Chen9, Lung Chan10,11,12, Cheng-Yu Wei13, Jiunn-Tay Lee14, Cheng-Yang Hsieh15, Yung-Yang Lin16, Shoou-Jeng Yeh17, Li-Ming Lien12,18* and Jiann-Shing Jeng2
  • 1Department of Neurology, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • 2Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 3Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
  • 4Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • 5Department of Neurology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
  • 6Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 7Department of Neurology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 8Department of Neurology, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 9Department of Neurology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 10Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Taipei Medical University–Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 11Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 12Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 13Department of Neurology, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhwa, Taiwan
  • 14Department of Neurology, Tri Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 15Department of Neurology, Tainan Sin Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • 16Department of Neurology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 17Department of Neurology, Cheng Ching General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 18Department of Neurology, Shin Kong WHS Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Background and Objectives: Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been approved for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 3 h after onset and the treatment was then extended to 4.5 h. However, the Food and Drug Administration did not approve the indication in the expanded time window. This retrospective, matched cohort study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of rt-PA in AIS at 3–4.5 h after onset.
Materials and Methods: The treatment group included AIS patients receiving rt-PA at 3–4.5 h after onset, otherwise complying with the regulation, in the stroke registries in 16 hospitals between 2008 and 2017. The control group included age- and sex-matched patients not receiving intravenous thrombolysis from the same registries, excluding those with contraindications. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–1 at day 90. The safety outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), early neurological deterioration and 3-month mortality.
Results: Each group had 374 patients. There were 34.0% of patients with 3-month mRS 0-1 in the treatment group vs. 22.7% in the control group with an odds ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence intervals, 1.27 to 2.42, P = 0.001). There was no difference in symptomatic ICH, early neurological deterioration and 3-month mortality rates between two groups. The 3-month mRS and symptomatic ICH did not differ significantly in patients receiving standard dose or low dose of rt-PA.
Conclusions: Our results support the prescription of rt-PA in AIS patients 3–4.5 h after onset as an effective and tolerable treatment in their functional recovery.

No comments:

Post a Comment