Did the patients say they were 100% recovered? I don't trust raters and the Rankin scale. What are you doing about the 66% of patients that did not get (mRS) 0–1? I'd say a 66% failure rate is failure.
Intravenous Thrombolysis Administration 3–4.5 h After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study
- 1Department of Neurology, Landseed International Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- 2Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- 4Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- 5Department of Neurology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- 6Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- 7Department of Neurology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 8Department of Neurology, En Chu Kong Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- 9Department of Neurology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- 10Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Taipei Medical University–Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- 11Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- 12Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- 13Department of Neurology, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhwa, Taiwan
- 14Department of Neurology, Tri Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 15Department of Neurology, Tainan Sin Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- 16Department of Neurology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 17Department of Neurology, Cheng Ching General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- 18Department of Neurology, Shin Kong WHS Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Background and Objectives: Intravenous
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been approved for
acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 3 h after onset and the treatment was
then extended to 4.5 h. However, the Food and Drug Administration did
not approve the indication in the expanded time window. This
retrospective, matched cohort study aims to investigate the
effectiveness and safety of rt-PA in AIS at 3–4.5 h after onset.
Materials and Methods: The treatment
group included AIS patients receiving rt-PA at 3–4.5 h after onset,
otherwise complying with the regulation, in the stroke registries in 16
hospitals between 2008 and 2017. The control group included age- and
sex-matched patients not receiving intravenous thrombolysis from the
same registries, excluding those with contraindications. The primary
outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–1 at day 90. The safety
outcomes were any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), early neurological
deterioration and 3-month mortality.
Results: Each group had 374 patients.
There were 34.0% of patients with 3-month mRS 0-1 in the treatment group
vs. 22.7% in the control group with an odds ratio of 1.75 (95%
confidence intervals, 1.27 to 2.42, P = 0.001). There was no
difference in symptomatic ICH, early neurological deterioration and
3-month mortality rates between two groups. The 3-month mRS and
symptomatic ICH did not differ significantly in patients receiving
standard dose or low dose of rt-PA.
Conclusions: Our results support the
prescription of rt-PA in AIS patients 3–4.5 h after onset as an
effective and tolerable treatment in their functional recovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment