Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Effects of mental practice embedded in daily therapy compared to therapy as usual in adult stroke patients in Dutch nursing homes: design of a randomised controlled trial

You can ask your doctor if any of this earlier research was enough to have interventions created already. Or your doctors and stroke hospital could wait 50 years for  SOMEONE ELSE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?   

ARE YOU OK WITH THAT AMOUNT OF INCOMPETENCY?

Effects of mental practice embedded in daily therapy compared to therapy as usual in adult stroke patients in Dutch nursing homes: design of a randomised controlled trial



BMC Neurology
Open Access
Study protocol
Effects of mental practice embedded in daily therapy compared to therapy as usual in adult stroke patients in Dutch nursing homes: design of a randomised controlled trial
SusyMBraun*
1,2,3,4
, AnnaJBeurskens
2,3
, SusanneMvan Kroonenburgh
5
, JeroenDemarteau
6
, JosMSchols
5,7,8
 and DerickTWade
9,10
 Address:
1
 The centre of expertise in life sciences, Zuyd University, Heerlen, The Netherlands,
2
 The department of health and technique, Zuyd University, Heerlen, The Netherlands,
3
 The research centre autonomy and participation, Zuyd University, Heerlen, The Netherlands,
4
 The care & public health institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
5
Klevarie nursing home, Vivre foundation, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
6
Nursing home St. Camillus, Land van Gelre en Gulick, Roermond, The Netherlands,
7
Department of general practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands,
8
Department Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands,
9
Department of rehabilitation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands and
10
Oxford centre for enablement, Oxford, UK Email: SusyMBraun*-s.braun@hszuyd.nl; AnnaJBeurskens-s.beurskens@hszuyd.nl; SusanneMvan Kroonenburgh-svankroonenburgh@vivre.nl; JeroenDemarteau-jeroendemarteau@home.nl; JosMSchols-jos.schols@HAG.unimaas.nl; DerickTWade-derick.wade@noc.anglox.nhs.uk * Corresponding author

Abstract


Background:
Mental practice as an additional cognitive therapy is getting increased attention in stroke rehabilitation. A systematic review shows some evidence that several techniques in which movements are rehearsed mentally might be effective but not enough to be certain. This trial investigates whether mental practice can contribute to a quicker and/or better recovery of stroke in two Dutch nursing homes. The objective is to investigate the therapeutic potential of mental practice embedded in daily therapy to improve individually chosen daily activities of adult stroke patients compared to therapy as usual. In addition, we will investigate prognostic variables and feasibility (process evaluation).
Methods:
A randomised, controlled, observer masked prospective trial will be conducted with adult stroke patients in the (sub)acute phase of stroke recovery. Over a six weeks intervention period the control group will receive multi professional therapy as usual. Patients in the experimental group will be instructed how to perform mental practice, and will receive care asusual in which mental practice is embedded in physical, occupation and speech therapy sessions.Outcome will be assessed at six weeks and six months. The primary outcome measure is the patient-perceived effect on performance of daily activities as assessed by an 11-point Likert Scale.Secondary outcomes are: Motricity Index, Nine Hole Peg Test, Barthel Index, Timed up and Go,10 metres walking test, Rivermead Mobility Index. A sample size of the patients group and all therapists will be interviewed on their opinion of the experimental program to assess feasibility. Allpatients are asked to keep a log to determine unguided training intensity.
Discussion:
Advantages and disadvantages of several aspects of the chosen design are discussed.
Trial registration:
ISRCTN27582267
P

No comments:

Post a Comment