You better hope your emergency room doctors are trained in this, especially for young adult strokes. Or you will need to demand an eye scan in the ER. Hope you are coherent enough to know how to challenge ER doctors on their expertise. Personally I'd prefer these much faster and objective ways of stroke determination, but then I know nothing, I'm not medically trained.
Hats off to Helmet of Hope - stroke diagnosis in 30 seconds February 2017
Microwave Imaging for Brain Stroke Detection and Monitoring using High Performance Computing in 94 seconds March 2017
New Device Quickly Assesses Brain Bleeding in Head Injuries - 5-10 minutes April 2017
The latest here:
Retinal photos taken in the emergency department helped differentiate transient ischemic attack from stroke mimics in the FOTO-TIA study
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Abstract
Objectives:
We
evaluated the frequency and predictive value of ocular fundus
abnormalities among patients who presented to the emergency department
(ED) with focal neurologic deficits to determine the utility of these
findings in the evaluation of patients with suspected TIA and stroke.
Methods:
In
this cross-sectional pilot study, ocular fundus photographs were
obtained using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. Demographic, neuroimaging,
and ABCD2 score components were collected. Photographs were
reviewed for retinal microvascular abnormalities. The results were
analyzed using univariate statistics and logistic regression modeling.
Results:
Two
hundred fifty-seven patients presented to the ED with focal neurologic
deficits, of whom 81 patients (32%) had cerebrovascular disease (CVD)
and 144 (56%; 95% confidence interval: 50%–62%) had retinal
microvascular abnormalities. Focal and general arteriolar narrowing
increased the odds of clinically diagnosed CVD by 5.5 and 2.6 times,
respectively, after controlling for the ABCD2 score and
diffusion-weighted imaging. These fundus findings also significantly
differentiated TIA from non-CVD, even after controlling for the ABCD2 score.
Conclusions:
Focal
and general arteriolar narrowing were independent predictors of CVD
overall, and TIA alone, even after controlling for the ABCD2
score and diffusion-weighted imaging lesions. The inclusion of
nonmydriatic ocular fundus photographs in the evaluation of patients
presenting to the ED with focal neurologic deficits may assist in the
differentiation of stroke and TIA from other causes of focal neurologic
deficits.
Annually in the United States, 200,000 to 500,000 patients experience TIA,1 with 7% to 14% subsequently having a stroke within 90 days.2 A number of scores, particularly the widely used ABCD2 score, were developed to determine which patients with TIA have the highest risk of stroke.2 However, these scores have serious limitations.3,–7 Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has revolutionized the differentiation of stroke from TIA.1
However, a negative DWI does not assist with the difficult, and
arguably more important, task of differentiating TIA from
non–cerebrovascular diseases, and TIA diagnosis remains very
challenging. About 30% to 50% of patients diagnosed with suspected TIA
by non neurologists are ultimately determined not to have a TIA by a
stroke neurologist.8,9 Even among non stroke neurologists, agreement about TIA is only moderate to good.10
Epidemiologic
investigations have shown an association between ocular fundus
abnormalities and diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and stroke,11,–17
suggesting that ocular funduscopic findings may be useful in the
diagnosis of TIA and stroke in patients who present to the emergency
department (ED) with focal neurologic deficits. Nonmydriatic fundus
cameras can be used to assess for abnormalities of the ocular fundus,
and the cameras are compact, easy to use, and do not require pupillary
dilation, making them an ideal tool for non ophthalmologists. We
undertook a pilot investigation to evaluate the role of ocular fundus
abnormalities in TIA and stroke diagnosis using patients who presented
to our ED with focal neurologic deficits during the Fundus Photography
vs Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department (FOTO-ED)
Study.
No comments:
Post a Comment