Useless. Predictions help survivors not one bit. The stupid, it burns. And you have no suggestion on how to prevent this malnutrition problem.
Prognostic Nutritional Index for Predicting 3-Month Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Thrombolysis
- 1Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
- 2Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
Objective: Malnutrition has been
reported to be related to adverse prognosis in acute ischemic stroke
(AIS) patients. Unfortunately, traditional nutritional assessment tools
usually increase the workload of neurologists, which makes them
unfeasible in the daily clinic work. We aimed to elucidate the
association between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), an easily
obtainable baseline nutritional marker, and 3-month outcomes in AIS
patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).
Research methods and procedures: The present study retrospectively included 405 patients. PNI was calculated as 5*lymphocyte count (109
/L) + serum albumin concentration (g/L), and the good prognosis was
defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0–3. The relationship between
PNI and clinical parameters was evaluated. The multiple logistic
regression model was performed to find out independent predictors of the
3-month outcomes.
Results: We found that the patients in the low PNI group had a higher frequency of anemia (12.9 vs. 2.3%, P < 0.001) and a higher level of the Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score (P < 0.001). The relationship between PNI and nutrition-related factors, such as body mass index (r = 0.208, P = 0.001), age (r = −0.329, P < 0.001), total cholesterol (r = 0.268, P < 0.001) and hemoglobin concentration (r = 0.328, P < 0.001), was significant. Low PNI value (adjusted odds ratio: 2.250, confidence interval: 1.192–4.249, p = 0.012) stayed as an independent predictor for the poor outcome at three months, after adjustment for potential confounders.
Conclusions: The PNI was independently
associated with 3-month outcomes in AIS patients undergoing IVT. As an
easily obtainable nutritional marker, PNI may be a useful nutritional
assessment tool in the clinic work.
Introduction
Malnutrition has been demonstrated to be correlated to
poor prognosis in a variety of diseases, such as heart failure,
malignant diseases as well as acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (1–5).
Also, studies have shown that nutritional status at admission was
independently associated with clinical outcomes in stroke patients (5).
As early nutritional intervention would improve the life quality of
malnourished patients, it is essential to assess nutritional status in
patients with AIS (6).
It is not easy to evaluate the nutritional status of the
patients. Many nutritional indicators are too subjective because they
are either affected by the examiners' experience or obtained verbally
from patients and their relatives. Moreover, collecting all the
subjective information would inevitably increase the workload of routine
clinical practice. As an objective nutritional marker, prognostic
nutritional index (PNI) was easy to calculate using serum albumin
concentration and lymphocyte count, which were routine detection index
in the blood test. Thus, PNI is more feasible in the clinic work.
As far as we know, it is still unclear whether
nutritional status assessed by PNI was useful for predicting the
short-term clinical outcome in AIS patients. We believed that
nutritional status on admission in AIS patients with intravenous
thrombolysis (IVT) could better represent the baseline nutritional
status. Because they have a short and relatively uniform onset-to
admission time when compared to the AIS patients without IVT, the
nutritional status of patients was less likely to be influenced by
neurological dysfunction during such a short time. Therefore, we aimed
to explore the prognostic significance of PNI in AIS patients receiving
IVT in the present study.
No comments:
Post a Comment