Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Friday, July 16, 2021

Physical Fitness Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE): Safety analyses of a randomized clinical trial

 My conclusion/opinion would be that if you have diabetes mellitus or atrial fibrillation you not do this physical fitness training, but they punted and suggested further research.

Physical Fitness Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE): Safety analyses of a randomized clinical trial

First Published April 7, 2021 Research Article Find in PubMed 

To report the six-month safety analyses among patients enrolled in the “Physical Fitness Training in Subacute Stroke—PHYS-STROKE” trial and identify underlying risk factors associated with serious adverse events.

We performed a pre-specified safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled, endpoint-blinded trial comprising 200 patients with moderate to severe subacute stroke (days 5–45 after stroke) that were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either aerobic, bodyweight supported, treadmill-based training (n = 105), or relaxation sessions (n = 95, control group). Each intervention session lasted for 25 min, five times weekly for four weeks, in addition to standard rehabilitation therapy. Serious adverse events defined as cerebro- and cardiovascular events, readmission to hospital, and death were assessed during six months of follow-up. Incident rate ratios (IRR) were calculated, and Poisson regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for serious adverse events and to test the association with aerobic training.

Six months after stroke, 50 serious adverse events occurred in the trial with a higher incidence rate (per 100 patient-months) in the training group compared to the relaxation group (6.31 vs. 3.22; IRR 1.70, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.12). The association of aerobic training with serious adverse events incidence rates were modified by diabetes mellitus (IRR for interaction: 7.10, 95% CI 1.56 to 51.24) and by atrial fibrillation (IRR for interaction: 4.37, 95% CI 0.97 to 31.81).

Safety analysis of the PHYS-STROKE trial found a higher rate of serious adverse events in patients randomized to aerobic training compared to control within six months after stroke. Exploratory analyses found an association between serious adverse events occurrence in the aerobic training group with pre-existing diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation which should be further investigated in future trials.

The raw data and analyses scripts are provided by the authors on a secure online repository for reproduction of reported findings.

The number of stroke survivors with impairments is increasing, rendering effective rehabilitation interventions a major unmet medical need.1 Aerobic training is a recommended treatment modality in stroke rehabilitation to counter cardiorespiratory deterioration.24 However, it remains uncertain whether training in the critical early period of stroke recovery can be carried out safely. Cardiorespiratory stress applied during early rehabilitation might cause adverse effects.5

The evidence of safety of aerobic training early after stroke is scarce. The latest Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis aggregated estimates of adverse effects including cerebro- and cardiovascular events in the stroke population but could not identify a higher risk in aerobic training compared to control interventions.6 Of note, the evidence derived mainly from small studies with limited reporting of adverse events.

Surprisingly and in contrast to smaller stroke rehabilitation trials, the results of the recent “Physical Fitness Training in Subacute Stroke” (PHYS-STROKE) trial,7 which randomized subacute stroke patients to early aerobic training or relaxation, identified a higher risk of serious adverse events (SAE) within three months post stroke in the training group compared to control.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment