Deans' stroke musings: National Patterns and Outcomes of Neurologist Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, December 12, 2022

National Patterns and Outcomes of Neurologist Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke

FYI, this just proves how bad stroke recovery is in the United states!

National Patterns and Outcomes of Neurologist Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Kate A. Moody, BS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-0255, Luke Maillie, BS, and Mandip S. Dhamoon, MD, DrPH mandip.dhamoon@mssm.eduView all authors and affiliations

Volume 13, Issue 1

https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744221129428

Abstract

Background & Purpose

Specialist care of acute ischemic stroke patients has been associated with improved outcomes but is not well-characterized. We sought to elucidate the involvement and influence of neurologists on acute ischemic stroke care.

Methods

Using 100% Medicare datasets, index acute ischemic stroke admissions from 2016-2018 were identified with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Neurologists were identified by NPI code. Neurologist involvement in care was defined as: “neurologist involved in care”; “hospital with a neurologist”; and “percent of acute ischemic stroke treated by neurologist.” Adjusted logistic regression models summarized exposure to neurologists and their association with outcomes (inpatient mortality, good outcome, and 30-day readmission).

Results

Among 647838 index AIS admissions from 2016-2018, 15.6% included a neurologist involved in care, associated with receiving intravenous thrombolysis (19.1% vs 6.5%), endovascular thrombectomy (13.2% vs 1.4%), treatment at a teaching hospital (87.7% vs 55.5%), and treatment at a hospital in the highest volume quartile (95.3% vs 75.6%). Of 4797 hospitals, 36.1% had a neurologist, among which the mean percent of admissions treated by a neurologist was 14.7% (SD 24.4). Neurologist involvement was associated with increased inpatient mortality (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.75-1.86), decreased odds of a good outcome (OR .92; 95% CI .90-.93), and increased 30-day readmission (OR 1.04; 95% C: 1.01-1.06).

Conclusions

The minority of acute ischemic stroke admissions among the elderly in the US are treated by neurologists. Neurologist involvement in care is associated with worse outcomes, possibly from the allocation of severe cases to neurologists.(It shouldn't make a damn bit of difference, all patients should get to 100% recovery. If your neurologist doesn't have those protocols, you don't have a functioning stroke doctor.)