Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Stroke Rounds: Does Severity Drive the Weekend Effect?

If we look objectively at what the problem is with weekend stroke care it is that too much subjective specialized knowledge is needed. The solution is to rely on objective measures that will diagnose a stroke like the Star Trek-style 'tricorder' invention offered $10m prize or One of these 17 ways still need to be be proven for fast and objective diagnosis. And if there were written stroke protocols we could evaluate their effectiveness rather than relying on seat-of-the-pants stroke interventions. But I know nothing since I am not medically trained.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/Strokes/48519?xid=nl_mpt_cardiodaily_2014-11-11&

The mortality impact of off-hours admission for stroke appeared to be largely related to severity, as quality of night and weekend care improved, a Danish study suggested.
Overall, death within 30 days was 15% more common among patients presenting to Danish hospitals on weekend, evening, or night-time hours compared with those admitted during regular business hours, Nina Sahlertz Kristiansen, MHSc, of the Centre for Quality in Middelfart, Denmark, and colleagues found.
Off-hours admissions were associated with a lower likelihood of meeting even eight out of 10 performance measures, but that difference diminished over time, particularly from 2003 to 2011 after a national quality improvement program, the group reported online in Stroke.
The key factor in the mortality difference appeared to be stroke severity, they noted.
Adjustment for patient characteristics -- "in particular, stroke severity" -- decreased the odds of 30-day case fatality to 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.10), whereas additional adjustment for hospital characteristics and compliance with performance measures had no effect.
The population-based Danish Stroke Registry study included 64,975 patients admitted to Danish hospitals with a first-ever acute stroke from Jan. 1, 2003 through Dec. 31, 2011 and used national healthcare records to determine outcome.
Among these patients, 39,072 were admitted on the weekend (Friday, 11 p.m. to Monday, 6:59 a.m.) or during evenings and night-time shifts on weekdays (3 p.m. to 7 a.m.).
"During the study period, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. was the only time during the day where the units in general were fully staffed, with the different healthcare professionals required in modern interdisciplinary stroke care," the researchers noted. "Outside this time frame, the nurse ratio was typically lower and the access to occupational therapists and physiotherapists restricted."
The overall quality of care by a composite performance measure was an absolute 11.8% poorer among patients admitted off-hours (adjusted relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.76).
Stroke severity didn't appear to account for that difference, based on adjusted risk, the researchers noted.
Rather, the "in general modest ... variation in care was substantially reduced after implementation of a national systematic quality improvement program," they noted.

No comments:

Post a Comment