Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure

Patients wouldn't be so complex if the damage from the neuronal cascade of death was prevented.
My 31 ideas on this are here, but since I'm not medically trained these are completely worthless.
The psychosocial issues could be handled if our doctors had protocols to get you 100% recovered.
http://jcomorbidity.com/index.php/test/article/view/63
Michelle L.A. Nelson, Elizabeth Hanna, Stephen Hall, Michael Calvert

Abstract


Background: Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of ‘complex patients’. No single definition of ‘patient complexity’ exists, therefore applied health researchers seek to understand ‘patient complexity’ as it relates to a specific clinical context.  
Objective: To understand how ‘patient complexity’ is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity
Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups.  
Results: Five elements of patient complexity were identified:  medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity.  
Conclusions: Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.
Journal of Comorbidity 2016;6(2):35–41

No comments:

Post a Comment