http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100821630003X
Choose an option to locate/access this article:
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution
Check accessHighlights
- •
- We discuss microglial and macrophage morphologies and phenotypic changes in response to acute brain damage and repair in the context of stroke.
- •
- Given these modifiable and adaptable functions of microglia/macrophages, we argue that future translational studies should be targeting multiple key regulating molecules involved in changes in microglia/macrophage activation and polarization and that the studies should incorporate the concept of a “therapeutic time window” for sequential therapies.
- •
- We also give some suggestions for further research, such as constructing new experimental stroke models, identifying new gene signatures for circulating immune cells when they enter into the CNS, and exploring the endogenous neuroprotective mechanisms responsible for brain repair, which may quicken the forward pace of research.
Abstract
Microglia/macrophages
are the major immune cells involved in the defence against brain
damage. Their morphology and functional changes are correlated with the
release of danger signals induced by stroke. These cells are normally
responsible for clearing away dead neural cells and restoring neuronal
functions. However, when excessively activated by the damage-associated
molecular patterns following stroke, they can produce a large number of
proinflammatory cytokines that can disrupt neural cells and the
blood-brain barrier and influence neurogenesis. These effects indicate
the important roles of microglia/macrophages in the pathophysiological
processes of stroke. However, the modifiable and adaptable nature of
microglia/macrophages may also be beneficial for brain repair and not
just result in damage. These distinct roles may be attributed to the
different microglia/macrophage phenotypes because the M1 population is
mainly destructive, while the M2 population is neuroprotective.
Additionally, different gene expression signature changes in
microglia/macrophages have been found in diverse inflammatory milieus.
These biofunctional features enable dual roles for microglia/macrophages
in brain damage and repair. Currently, it is thought that the proper
inflammatory milieu may provide a suitable microenvironment for
neurogenesis; however, detailed mechanisms underlying the inflammatory
responses that initiate or inhibit neurogenesis remain unknown. This
review summarizes recent progress concerning the mechanisms involved in
brain damage, repair and regeneration related to microglia/macrophage
activation and phenotype transition during stroke. We also argue that
future translational studies should be targeting multiple key regulating
molecules to improve brain repair, which should be accompanied by the
concept of a “therapeutic time window” for sequential therapies.
No comments:
Post a Comment