Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Brilinta Boosts Secondary Stroke Prevention

For discussion with your doctor and while you are at it ask what the 30-day death rate is at their hospital. No knowledge, fire them, because it means they don't care about or know what the fuck they are doing.

DO YOU MEASURE ANYTHING?
  1. tPA full recovery? Better than 12%?
  2. 30 day deaths? Better than competitors?
  3. rehab full recovery? Better than 10%?

Brilinta Boosts Secondary Stroke Prevention

— THALES trial supports addition to aspirin but comparison with clopidogrel now needed

A box of Brilinta over a photo of aspirin tablets
For acute ischemic strokes, early treatment with ticagrelor (Brilinta) and aspirin was better than aspirin alone for secondary prevention, the THALES trial showed.
In people with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), the composite outcome of stroke or death in the 30 days after randomization favored a 30-day regimen of ticagrelor plus aspirin over aspirin alone (5.5% vs 6.6%, HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96).
This was driven by fewer ischemic strokes (5.0% vs 6.3%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), with no significant difference in mortality rates between groups (0.7% vs 0.5%, HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.81-2.19). Disability rates didn't differ significantly.
The dual antiplatelet group experienced more severe bleeding by GUSTO criteria (0.5% vs 0.1%, HR 3.99, 95% CI 1.74-9.14) and more intracranial hemorrhage (0.4% vs 0.1%, HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.34-8.28), reported the investigators, led by S. Claiborne Johnston, MD, PhD, of Dell Medical School of the University of Texas at Austin.
A full manuscript of the study was published in the July 16 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Topline data were previously announced by trial sponsor AstraZeneca.
"The benefit from treatment with ticagrelor-aspirin as compared with aspirin alone would be expected to result in a number needed to treat of 92 to prevent one primary-outcome event and a number needed to harm of 263 for severe bleeding," the researchers concluded.
"Based on these results, plus the higher severe bleeding with ticagrelor, and greater expense, I don't think ticagrelor will replace clopidogrel [Plavix] as part of the dual antiplatelet regimen used after high risk TIA or minor stroke," commented James Grotta, MD, of Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center in Houston.
The CHANCE-2 trial directly comparing ticagrelor against clopidogrel as the add-on to aspirin is ongoing. Until then, it is "hard to compare" these drugs without a head-to-head comparison, Grotta said.
Nevertheless, the POINT and CHANCE studies suggested larger relative reductions in the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with clopidogrel-aspirin compared to THALES' ticagrelor-aspirin, according to Peter Rothwell, MD, PhD, of University of Oxford, England, writing in an editorial.
Moreover, the risk in major bleeding was increased to a greater extent with the ticagrelor combination than the clopidogrel one, particularly with respect to intracranial hemorrhage, Rothwell continued.
Finally, clopidogrel-aspirin resulted in a significant reduction in risk of disabling or fatal stroke versus aspirin alone in a pooled analysis of the POINT and CHANCE trials, whereas ticagrelor-aspirin did not achieve the same in THALES, he noted.
Grotta said he would have expected the ticagrelor-aspirin combination to have produced greater benefit over aspirin than what was seen with clopidogrel-aspirin given the genetic polymorphism for clopidogrel response.
"Regardless of which combination of antiplatelet drugs is favored for the high-risk minority, all patients should receive aspirin immediately after TIA unless aspirin is contraindicated. Too many patients are sent home from emergency departments without this simple treatment that substantially reduces the risk and severity of early recurrent stroke," Rothwell urged.
THALES included 11,016 participants who presented with acute ischemic stroke (NIH Stroke Scale score 5 or less) or high-risk TIA at 414 sites in 28 countries who were not undergoing thrombolysis or thrombectomy.
People were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset. They either received a 30-day regimen of ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (300-325 mg on the first day, followed by 75-100 mg daily) or matching placebo plus aspirin.
Baseline characteristics were similar between study arms. Mean age was 65 years, and 39% of the participants were women.
People already on aspirin before their index stroke or TIA accounted for 13% of the group.
Johnston and colleagues noted the limited generalizability of THALES to excluded populations, namely those with more severe strokes, cardioembolic strokes, and people who had treatment initiated more than 24 hours after symptom onset. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation were also excluded.
"The bleeding risk associated with ticagrelor and aspirin might exceed the benefit among lower-risk patients who make up the majority in practice, and so the current trial results should not be overgeneralized," Rothwell cautioned.
Ticagrelor was first approved by the FDA in 2011 for the indication of thrombotic event risk reduction in people with acute coronary syndrome.
Last month, the P2Y12 inhibitor won an expanded indication to reduce risk of a first heart attack or stroke in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
  • author['full_name']
    Nicole Lou is a reporter for MedPage Today, where she covers cardiology news and other developments in medicine. Follow
Disclosures
The trial was funded by AstraZeneca, which also analyzed the data.
Johnston reported receiving an institutional grant from AstraZeneca.
Rothwell disclosed receiving personal fees from Bayer and BMS.

No comments:

Post a Comment