Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

Cognitive Intervention Strategies Directed to Speech and Language Deficits in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Practice-Based Evidence from 18 Cases

 Where is the protocol located and have you delivered it to all 10 million yearly stroke survivors  and created a method to continue to do that in the future?

Cognitive Intervention Strategies Directed to Speech and Language Deficits in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Practice-Based Evidence from 18 Cases

 
1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde do Adulto, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte MG 30130-100, Brazil
2 Grupo de Pesquisa em Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte MG 30130-100, Brazil
3 Av Prudente de Morais, 290-Sala 1106, Belo Horizonte MG 30380-002, Brazil
Grupo de Estudos em Neurociência da Linguagem e Cognição, Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Neurociência Aplicada, Centro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição da Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo SP 09210-580, Brazil
5 Grupo de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento, Divisão de Clínica Neurológica, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP 05403-000, Brazil
6 INCT-ECCE (Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino), Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, São Carlos SP 13565-905, Brazil
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Jordi A. Matias-Guiu, Robert Jr Laforce and Rene L. Utianski
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(10), 1268; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11101268
Received: 11 August 2021 / Revised: 16 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 25 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Primary Progressive Aphasia)
Background: 
Practice-based evidence can inform and support clinical decision making. Case-report series about the implementation of programs in real-world clinical settings may contribute to verifying the effectiveness of interventions for treating PPA in specific contexts, as well as illustrating challenges that need to be overcome. 
Objective: 
To describe and provide practice-based evidence on the effectiveness of four cognitive rehabilitation programs designed for individuals with PPA and directed to speech and language impairments, which were implemented in a specialized outpatient clinic. 
Methods: 
Multiple single-case study. Eighteen individuals with different subtypes of PPA were each assigned to one out of four training programs based on comprehensive speech and language assessments. The treatments targeted naming deficits, sentence production, speech apraxia, and phonological deficits. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were undertaken to compare trained and untrained items. Gains were generalized to a different task in the first two types of intervention (naming and sentence production). A follow-up assessment was conducted 1–8 months after treatment among 7 participants. 
Results: 
All individuals presented better performance in the trained items at the post-test for each rehabilitation program accomplished, demonstrating that learning of the trained strategies was achieved during the active phase of treatment. For 13 individuals, statistical significance was reached; while for five, the results were maintained. Results about untrained items, generalization to other tasks, and follow-up assessments are presented. 
Conclusion: 
The positive results found in our sample bring some practice-based evidence for the benefits of speech and language treatment strategies for clinical management of individuals with PPA. View Full-Text

No comments:

Post a Comment