Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, July 4, 2022

Guided, internet based, cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID)

With your chance of post stroke PTSD you'll want something better than non-inferiority, you'll want no PTSD at all. And the way to accomplish that is EXACT 100% REHAB RECOVERY PROTOCOLS, nothing less.

You do have a 23% chance of stroke survivors getting PTSD.

The latest here:

Guided, internet based, cognitive behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID)

BMJ 2022; 377 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069405 (Published 16 June 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;377:e069405
  1. Jonathan I Bisson, clinical professor in psychiatry1,  
  2. Cono Ariti, study statistician2,  
  3. Katherine Cullen, research officer3,  
  4. Neil Kitchiner, director and honorary senior research fellow1 4,  
  5. Catrin Lewis, research associate1,  
  6. Neil P Roberts, consultant clinical psychologist and honorary senior research fellow1 4,  
  7. Natalie Simon, research assistant1,  
  8. Kim Smallman, research associate2,  
  9. Katy Addison, research associate2,  
  10. Vicky Bell, research associate5,  
  11. Lucy Brookes-Howell, senior research fellow2,  
  12. Sarah Cosgrove, public advisory group chair1,  
  13. Anke Ehlers, professor and principal research fellow6,  
  14. Deborah Fitzsimmons, professor3,  
  15. Paula Foscarini-Craggs, research associate2,  
  16. Shaun R S Harris, research officer3,  
  17. Mark Kelson, associate professor7,  
  18. Karina Lovell, professor5,  
  19. Maureen McKenna, lead consultant psychological therapist8,  
  20. Rachel McNamara, principal research fellow2,  
  21. Claire Nollett, research associate2,  
  22. Tim Pickles, doctoral fellow2,  
  23. Rhys Williams-Thomas, research associate2
    Author affiliations
  1. Correspondence to: J I Bisson bissonji@cardiff.ac.uk
  • Accepted 4 May 2022

Abstract

Objective To determine if guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is non-inferior to individual face-to-face CBT-TF for mild to moderate post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to one traumatic event.

Design Pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (RAPID).

Setting Primary and secondary mental health settings across the UK’s NHS.

Participants 196 adults with a primary diagnosis of mild to moderate PTSD were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to one of two interventions, with 82% retention at 16 weeks and 71% retention at 52 weeks. 19 participants and 10 therapists were purposively sampled and interviewed for evaluation of the process.

Interventions Up to 12 face-to-face, manual based, individual CBT-TF sessions, each lasting 60-90 minutes; or guided internet based CBT-TF with an eight step online programme, with up to three hours of contact with a therapist and four brief telephone calls or email contacts between sessions.

Main outcome measures Primary outcome was the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) at 16 weeks after randomisation (diagnosis of PTSD based on the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, DSM-5). Secondary outcomes included severity of PTSD symptoms at 52 weeks, and functioning, symptoms of depression and anxiety, use of alcohol, and perceived social support at 16 and 52 weeks after randomisation.

Results Non-inferiority was found at the primary endpoint of 16 weeks on the CAPS-5 (mean difference 1.01, one sided 95% confidence interval −∞ to 3.90, non-inferiority P=0.012). Improvements in CAPS-5 score of more than 60% in the two groups were maintained at 52 weeks, but the non-inferiority results were inconclusive in favour of face-to-face CBT-TF at this time point (3.20, −∞ to 6.00, P=0.15). Guided internet based CBT-TF was significantly (P<0.001) cheaper than face-to-face CBT-TF and seemed to be acceptable and well tolerated by participants. The main themes of the qualitative analysis were facilitators and barriers to engagement with guided internet based CBT-TF, treatment outcomes, and considerations for its future implementation.

Conclusions Guided internet based CBT-TF for mild to moderate PTSD to one traumatic event was non-inferior to individual face-to-face CBT-TF and should be considered a first line treatment for people with this condition.

Trial registration ISRCTN13697710.

No comments:

Post a Comment