Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Neutropenia Drug Falls Flat for Acute Stroke

I had written about this earlier here:
http://oc1dean.blogspot.com/2011/08/sygnis-pharma-ag-has-completed-patient.html
The newest failure here:
http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ASAMeeting/31032?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DailyHeadlines&utm_source=WC&eun=g424561d0r&userid=424561&email=oc1dean@yahoo.com&mu_id=
An agent used for treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies had no effect on outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke, a randomized trial showed.

At 90 days, functional outcomes were similar whether patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, known as filgrastim (Neupogen), or placebo, according to E. Bernd Ringelstein, MD, of the University of Münster in Germany.

There were no effects on any other outcomes either, he reported at the American Stroke Association's International Stroke Conference here.

He said there were no clear explanations for why the drug failed to live up to the expectations engendered by a successful preclinical program.

"Our results confirm a principle problem in the translation of preclinical work into the clinical stroke trials," he said, "and it seems we are again thrown back to [a] statement from the 80s, saying that 'The outlook for stroke therapy is excellent ... if you are a rat.'"

Filgrastim, called AX200 for the purposes of the stroke studies, was expected to work in acute ischemic stroke because granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor are expressed by neurons as a protective response to injury. In the brain, the agent has anti-apoptotic properties and stimulates neurogenesis, arteriogenesis, and neurite growth.

In the phase IIa AXIS study, the treatment was safe and well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke, leading to the creation of the phase III AXIS-2 study, which was conducted in seven European countries.

The researchers randomized 328 patients with an acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory. All were younger than 85 (mean age 69) and all were treated less than nine hours after stroke onset.

About two-thirds of the patients had received IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) before randomization.

AX200 was given intravenously at a dose of 135 µg/kg over 72 hours.

The drug did what it was supposed to do in the blood, increasing in concentration in the plasma, stimulating production of white blood cells and monocytes, and slightly reducing platelet count.

But the drug failed to improve the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. The average score was 3.31 in the treatment arm and 3.12 in the placebo arm (P=0.3034).

There was also no difference on the NIH stroke scale score (8.88 versus 8.45, P=0.6121) or on 90-day mortality (22% versus 18%, P=0.4042).

The results were consistent regardless of whether the patients received thrombolytic therapy before entering the study.

Serious adverse events occurred at similar rates in the two groups including:

  • Nervous system disorders: 27.1% witih AX200 and 15.3% with placebo
  • Infections: 8.1% and 8.6%
  • Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders: 4.3% and 6.7%

No comments:

Post a Comment