Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Unstable Shoes Increase Energy Expenditure of Obese Patients

I know this is a stupid idea but  would these types of shoes correct our balance problems faster because we would need to engage all the muscles of our feet and legs to stay upright? Never mind, the fall risk would prevent any type of testing of this for stroke rehab. I do wonder what makes them unstable. Maybe like this?

http://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2812%2900008-3/fulltext

Abstract 

Background

Ergonomic unstable shoes, which are widely available to the general population, could increase daily non-exercise activity thermogenesis as the result of increased muscular involvement. We compared the energy expenditure of obese patients during standing and walking with conventional flat-bottomed shoes versus unstable shoes.

Methods

Twenty-nine obese patients were asked to stand quietly and to walk at their preferred walking speed while wearing unstable or conventional shoes. The main outcome measures were metabolic rate of standing and gross and net energy cost of walking, as assessed with indirect calorimetry.

Results

Metabolic rate of standing was higher while wearing unstable shoes compared with conventional shoes (1.11±0.20 W/kg−1vs 1.06±0.23 W/kg−1, P=.0098). Gross and net energy cost of walking were higher while wearing unstable shoes compared with conventional shoes (gross: 4.20±0.42 J/kg−1/m−1vs 4.01±0.39 J/kg−1/m−1, P=.0035; net: 3.37±0.41 J/kg−1/m−1vs 3.21±0.37 J/kg−1/m−1; P=.032).

Conclusion

In obese patients, it is possible to increase energy expenditure of standing and walking by means of ergonomic unstable footwear. Long-term use of unstable shoes may eventually prevent a positive energy balance.

No comments:

Post a Comment