Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Panel backs aspirin for heart health in certain adults

None of the stroke risk calculators I've taken have ever shown me to be higher than a low risk. So that great stroke association would determine why all these calculators are missing predicting strokes. Well in a perfect world that would occur, but in reality we have crapola for stroke associations, doing nothing useful for survivors.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/aspirin-heart-health-cancer-prevention/
A government task force says a daily low-dose aspirin could help certain people in their 50s and 60s prevent a first heart attack or stroke - and they might get some protection against colon cancer at the same time.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued draft guidelines Monday recommending aspirin only if people meet a strict list of criteria - including a high risk of heart disease and a low risk of bleeding side effects.
The guidelines said the recommendation is strongest for 50-somethings, but that doctors should decide aspirin therapy on a case-by-case basis for people in their 60s, who can expect a smaller benefit.
Potential candidates should have at least a 10 percent risk of a heart attack or stroke over the next decade, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years and be willing to take daily aspirin that long, and not have other health conditions that cause bleeding, the guidelines said. That's because prolonged aspirin use can trigger serious bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract or brain.
When it comes to dosing, the range that has been studied runs the gamut from high to low, but CBS News medical contributor Dr. Tara Narula, a cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, says sticking to low-dose baby aspirin is best.
"The evidence shows that there's really no incremental benefit of going over 81 milligrams, and in fact, you may increase bleeding risk by going over," she told "CBS This Morning."
Aspirin therapy has long been recommended for heart attack survivors, but who should try it for what's called primary prevention - protection of a first heart attack or stroke - is less clear. And while studies suggest years of daily aspirin use may lower the risk of colon cancer, no major health organizations recommend taking it solely for that reason.
Neither do the task force guidelines - the aspirin decision is supposed to be made on the basis of patients' heart health - but it concluded the cancer information would be useful as doctors and patients discuss the choice.
"If you're a person trying to decide whether to take aspirin, you'd want to be aware of all the potential benefits and the potential harms," said Dr. Douglas Owens, a Stanford University professor and task force member.
And could aspirin help reduce the risk of other cancers?
"There's some research to suggest it might, but the evidence to date is really just for colon cancer and you have to take the aspirin for more than 10 years to start seeing the benefit in terms of decreasing your risk of colon cancer and decreasing your risk of dying from colon cancer," Narula said.
The task force said there's not enough evidence to assess aspirin therapy for those under 50 or over 69. The updated guidelines back aspirin for a narrower age range than the last time the task force weighed the question, but for the first time adds information about the possible cancer benefit if people use aspirin long enough.
The guidelines are in line with American Heart Association recommendations, said Dr. Elliott Antman, a Harvard University professor and former AHA president who welcomed them.
In contrast, the Food and Drug Administration last year ruled that there wasn't enough evidence to support marketing aspirin for prevention of first heart attacks.

No comments:

Post a Comment