Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, September 21, 2015

Cross-National Key Performance Measures of the Quality of Acute Stroke Care in Western Europe

How long before this is measured in the United States? I bet at least 50 years since our stroke associations will not be tackling this project until management is replaced by stroke survivors who will work on solving all the problems in stroke, rather than sitting on their asses, JUST WAITING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM! The former president of the WSO (Bo Norrving, MD, PhD,) seems to be doing more after his term than when he was president.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/early/2015/08/11/STROKEAHA.115.008811.abstract?sid=be9cbfe0-ac87-4d08-899e-ede87e9d54aa
  1. for the European Implementation Score Collaboration
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (B.N.); Division for Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom (B.D.B., A.G.R., C.D.A.W.); Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden (K.A.); Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (P.H., S.W.); Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (P.L.); National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research, Centre Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (A.G.R., C.D.A.W.); and Department of Integrated Care, German Stroke Foundation, Gütersloh, Germany (M.W.).
  1. Correspondence to Benjamin D. Bray, MD, PhD, Division of Health and Social Care Research, Capital House, 42 Weston St, London SE1 3QD, United Kingdom. E-mail benjamin.bray@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

Background and Purpose—There are no agreed measures of stroke care quality that enable the standardized comparison of stroke care between countries. We aimed to develop a set of measures of quality of acute stroke care involving stroke quality registers in Western Europe.
Methods—A multinational working group identified 6 regional or national stroke quality registers in Europe and reviewed their data sets, performance measures, and the method by which these had been developed. Measures used in the registers were presented for discussion to a consensus group of representatives from the quality registers identified, as well as other stroke experts, and the final set of common performance measures was agreed through majority consensus.
Results—Thirty final performance measures were agreed by the European consensus group, encompassing the domains of coordination of care (stroke unit–based care), diagnosis (brain imaging, vascular imaging, cardiac arrhythmia detection, and therapy assessment), preservation of neural tissue (thrombolytic therapy and door-to-needle time), prevention of complications (dysphagia screening), initiation of secondary prevention (antiplatelet, anticoagulation, lipid lowering, blood pressure lowering, carotid surgery, time from vascular imaging to carotid surgery, and smoking cessation), survival (90-day poststroke mortality), and functional outcomes (90-day modified Rankin Scale).
Conclusions—On the basis of experience of quality registers in Europe, we have proposed a common set of performance measures that will facilitate the international comparison of acute stroke care quality.

No comments:

Post a Comment