So prior to this our medical teams were completely blind in cognitive testing post stroke. Aren't you glad you were a guinea pig in your doctors unregistered research? I bet your doctor provided your results to no one.
https://search.naric.com/research/rehab/redesign_record.cfm?search=2&type=all&criteria=J77631&phrase=no&rec=135597&article_source=Rehab&international=0&international_language=&international_location=
Rehabilitation Psychology
, Volume 62(4)
, Pgs. 443-454.
NARIC Accession Number: J77631. What's this?
ISSN: 0090-5550.
Author(s): Carlozzi, Noelle E; Tulsky, David S.; Wolf, Timothy J.; Goodnight, Siera.; Heaton, Robert K.; Casaletto, Kaitlin B.; Wong, Alex W. K; Baum, Carolyn; Gershon, Richard C.; Heinemann, Allen W..
Project Number:
90RT5008 (formerly H133B090024).
Publication Year: 2017.
Number of Pages: 12.
Abstract: Study evaluated the construct validity of
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox (NIHTB) for the
Assessment of Behavior and Neurological Function Cognition Battery
(NIHTB-CB) in individuals with stroke. The NIHTB-CB provides a brief
assessment (approximately 30 minutes) of key components of cognition. A
total of 131 individuals with stroke (71 with mild stroke; 60 with
moderate/severe stroke) completed the NIHTB-CB. Univariate analyses were
conducted to examine the cognitive profiles of the two different stroke
groups (mild versus moderate/severe stroke) on NIHTB-CB measures and
composite scores. Pearson correlations were computed to evaluate
relationships between NIHTB-CB and established measures to examine
convergent and discriminant validity. Effect sizes and clinical
impairment rates for the different NIHTB-CB measures and composite
scores were also examined. Participants experiencing moderate-to-severe
stroke had poorer performance than did individuals with mild stroke on
several of the NIHTB cognition measures. Evidence of convergent validity
was provided by moderate-to-strong correlations between the NIHTB
measures and the corresponding standard neuropsychological test (Pearson
correlation coefficients ranged from 0.31 to 0.88). Evidence of
discriminant validity was provided by smaller correlations between
different cognitive domains than correlations of measures within the
same domain. Effect sizes for composite and subtest scores regarding
stroke severity were generally moderate-to-large. In addition, 42
percent of the sample were exhibiting mild cognitive impairment (i.e.,
≥2 low scores on fluid tests). Findings provide support for the
construct validity of the NIHTB-CB in individuals with stroke.
Descriptor Terms: COGNITION, MEASUREMENTS, OUTCOMES, PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, PROGRAM EVALUATION, STROKE.
Can this document be ordered through NARIC's document delivery service*?: Y.
Citation: Carlozzi, Noelle E, Tulsky, David S.,
Wolf, Timothy J., Goodnight, Siera., Heaton, Robert K., Casaletto,
Kaitlin B., Wong, Alex W. K, Baum, Carolyn, Gershon, Richard C.,
Heinemann, Allen W.. (2017). Construct validity of the NIH toolbox cognition battery in individuals with stroke.
Rehabilitation Psychology
, 62(4), Pgs. 443-454. Retrieved 2/21/2018, from REHABDATA database.
Use the labels in the right column to find what you want. Or you can go thru them one by one, there are only 29,112 posts. Searching is done in the search box in upper left corner. I blog on anything to do with stroke.DO NOT DO ANYTHING SUGGESTED HERE AS I AM NOT MEDICALLY TRAINED, YOUR DOCTOR IS, LISTEN TO THEM. BUT I BET THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET YOU 100% RECOVERED. I DON'T EITHER, BUT HAVE PLENTY OF QUESTIONS FOR YOUR DOCTOR TO ANSWER.
Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.
What this blog is for:
My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment