You people are fucking worthless, telling us we need more followup research rather than completing the research properly and writing stroke protocols on it. The point of stroke research is to help patients recover. The president of that great stroke association should be forcefully communicating that to all stroke researchers.
Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation
- Marco GermanottaEmail authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Arianna Cruciani,
- Cristiano Pecchioli,
- Simona Loreti,
- Albino Spedicato,
- Matteo Meotti,
- Rita Mosca,
- Gabriele Speranza,
- Francesca Cecchi,
- Giorgia Giannarelli,
- Luca Padua and
- Irene Aprile
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation201815:39
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 6 December 2017
Accepted: 10 May 2018
Published: 16 May 2018
Abstract
Background
In the last few years, there
has been an increasing interest in the use of robotic devices to
objectively quantify motor performance of patients after brain damage.
Although these robot-derived measures can potentially add meaningful
information about the patient’s dexterity, as well as be used as outcome
measurements after the rehabilitation treatment, they need to be
validated before being used in clinical practice. The present work aims
to evaluate the reliability, the validity and the discriminant ability
of the metrics provided by a novel robotic device for upper limb
rehabilitation.
Methods
Forty-eight patients with
sub-acute stroke and 40 age-matched healthy subjects were involved in
this study. Clinical evaluation included: Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the
upper limb, Action Research Arm Test, and Barthel Index. Robotic
evaluation of the upper limb performance consisted of 14 measures of
motor ability quantifying the dexterity in performing planar reaching
movements. Patients were evaluated twice, one day apart, to assess the
reliability of the robotic metrics, using the Intraclass Correlation
Coefficient. Validity was assessed by analyzing the correlation of the
robotic metrics with the clinical scales, by means of the Spearman’s
Correlation Coefficient. Finally, the ability of the robotic metrics to
distinguish between patients with stroke and healthy subjects was
investigated with t-tests and the Effect Size.
Results
Reliability was found to be
excellent for 12 measures and from moderate to good for the remaining 2.
Most of the robotic indices were strongly correlated with the clinical
scales, while a few showed a moderate correlation and only one was not
correlated with the Barthel Index and weakly correlated with the remain
two. Finally, all but one the provided metrics were able to discriminate
between the two groups, with large effect sizes for most of them.
Conclusion
We found that all the robotic
indices except one provided by a novel robotic device for upper limb
rehabilitation are reliable, sensitive and strongly correlated both with
motor and disability clinical scales. Therefore, this device is
suitable as evaluation tool for the upper limb motor performance of
patients with sub-acute stroke in clinical practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment