Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, August 26, 2021

Association of Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis With Brain White Matter Hyperintensity

My doctor told me I had a bunch of white matter hyperintensities but never showed me them on any scan, so I don't know the size, location or any intervention needed, because my doctor knew nothing and did nothing. Of course he also never found the 80% blockage in the right carotid artery and only thru blind dumb luck did I not have another stroke in the three years it took to completely close that artery.

 

Association of Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis With Brain White Matter Hyperintensity

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032674Stroke. 2021;52:2594–2600

Background and Purpose:

We aim to determine, in healthy high-risk adults, the association between subclinical coronary artery disease and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and location, independent of atherosclerotic risk factors.

Methods:

Seven hundred eighty-two asymptomatic first-degree relatives of index cases with early-onset coronary artery disease (<60 years old) from GeneSTAR (Genetic Study of Atherosclerosis Risk) with contemporaneous coronary computed tomography angiography and brain magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models, accounting for family structure, evaluated the association of total WMH volume and 3 regions (deep WMH, periventricular WMH [PVWMH], or borderzone [cuff]) with markers of coronary artery disease. Separate models were created for total WMH, deep WMH, PVWMH, and cuff volumes, each, as dependent variables, across coronary computed tomography angiography variables, adjusted for covariates.

Results:

Mean age was 51 years ±10, with 58% women and 39% African American people. Participants with any coronary plaque had 52% larger WMH volumes than those without plaque (95% CI, 0.24–0.59). Per 1% greater coronary plaque volume, total WMH volumes were 0.07% larger (95% CI, 0.04–0.10). Every 1% higher total coronary plaque volume was associated with 5.03% larger deep WMH volume (95% CI, 4.67–5.38), 5.10% PVWMH larger volume (95% CI, 4.72–5.48), and 2.74% larger cuff volume (95% CI, 2.38–3.09) with differences in this association when comparing deep WMH to PVWMH (P interaction, 0.001) or cuff (P interaction, <0.001), respectively.

Conclusions:

In healthy, high-risk individuals, the presence and volume of coronary artery plaque are associated with larger WMH volumes, appearing the strongest for PVWMH. These findings in high-risk families suggest a disease relationship in 2 different vascular beds, beyond traditional risk factors, possibly due to genetic predisposition.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment