Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-arterial thrombectomy: The optiMAL Blood Pressure control (OPTIMAL-BP) Trial

What research is your doctor and hospital initiating to remove the uncertainty of blood pressure management? Doing nothing  should be cause for firing up to and including the board of directors.

Outcome in Patients Treated with Intra-arterial thrombectomy: The optiMAL Blood Pressure control (OPTIMAL-BP) Trial

First Published August 29, 2021 Product Review Find in PubMed 

Very early stage blood pressure (BP) levels may affect outcome in stroke patients who have successfully undergone recanalization following intra-arterial treatment, but the optimal target of BP management remains uncertain.

We hypothesized that the clinical outcome after intensive BP-lowering is superior to conventional BP control after successful recanalization by intra-arterial treatment.

We aim to randomize 668 patients (334 per arm), 1:1.

We initiated a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with a blinded end-point assessment (PROBE) design. After successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥ 2 b), patients with elevated systolic BP level, defined as the mean of two readings ≥ 140 mmHg, will be randomly assigned to the intensive BP-lowering (systolic BP < 140 mm Hg) group or the conventional BP-lowering (systolic BP, 140−180 mm Hg) group.

The primary efficacy outcomes are from dichotomized analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at three months (mRS scores: 0–2 vs. 3–6). The primary safety outcomes are symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death within three months.

The OPTIMAL-BP trial will provide evidence for the effectiveness of active BP control to achieve systolic BP < 140 mmHg during 24 h in patients with successful recanalization after intra-arterial treatment.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04205305.

Recent endovascular thrombectomy trials have proven the effectiveness of intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in patients with large cerebral artery occlusion. The recanalization rate of IAT is approximately 80%, but only 50% of patients achieve functional independence.1 Therefore, new treatment strategies are needed to reduce the rate of poor outcomes. One potential strategy is to optimize management of blood pressure (BP) in patients with successful recanalization after IAT.

BP is associated with outcome of stroke patients with recanalization treatment. Spontaneous decline of BP over 12 to 24 h after IAT more often occurs in patients with successful recanalization than in those with persistent occlusion.24 BP directly affects cerebral perfusion pressure. Low BP may decrease the cerebral perfusion pressure and exert harmful effects on ischemic brain areas. In contrast, sustained high BP may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and worse functional outcomes.57

The American Heart Association guidelines recommend reducing BP below 180/105 mmHg in patients after successful recanalization (class of recommendation IIb, level of evidence B-NR). The European guidelines recommend keeping BP below 180/105 mmHg during and 24 h after IAT.8 In contrast, previous retrospective studies and meta-analysis have shown a possible association between BP within 24 h after IAT and clinical outcomes and suggested that lowering BP may be beneficial.5,6,9 However, the optimal target of BP control in stroke patients with successful recanalization following IAT remains uncertain.

The aim of this trial is to determine whether the clinical outcome of aggressive BP-lowering is superior to that of conventional BP-lowering after successful recanalization by IAT.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment