Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Monday, January 9, 2023

A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers: A case series in chronic and acute stroke patients

I have been passively flexing and unflexing my fingers at least 20 minutes a day for the past 16 years. No functional movement improvement. 

So someone needs to come up with a solution to cure finger spasticity. It would massively improve survivors lives. 

15 years since this came out and with NO STROKE LEADERSHIP, nothing has been done in those 15 years to cure spasticity.  That is how fucking incompetent the stroke medical world is. NOTHING IS EVER ACCOMPLISHED TO HELP SURVIVORS. Survivors need to be in charge.

A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers: A case series in chronic and acute stroke patients

2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
 StefanHesse 1, 
HKuhlmann 1, 
JWilk  1, 
CTomelleri 1 
and StephenGBKirker * 2
 Address:
1 Klinik Berlin, Department Neurological Rehabilitation, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Germany and
2  Addenbrooke's Rehabilitation Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK Email: StefanHesse-s.hesse@medicalpark.de; HKuhlmann-labor@reha-hesse.de; JWilk-labor@reha-hesse.de; CTomelleri-labor@reha-hesse.de; StephenGBKirker*-stephen.kirker@addenbrookes.nhs.uk * Corresponding author

Abstract

Background:
 
The functional outcome after stroke is improved by more intensive or sustained therapy. When the affected hand has no functional movement, therapy is mainly passive movements. A novel device for repeating controlled passive movements of paralysed fingers has been developed, which will allow therapists to concentrate on more complicated tasks. A powered cam shaft moves the four fingers in a physiological range of movement.
 
Methods:
 
After refining the training protocol in 2 chronic patients, 8 sub-acute stroke patients were randomised to receive additional therapy with the Finger Trainer for 20 min every work day for four weeks, or the same duration of bimanual group therapy, in addition to their usual rehabilitation.
 
Results:
 
In the chronic patients, there was a sustained reduction in finger and wrist spasticity, but there was no improvement in active movements. In the subacute patients, mean distal Fugl-Meyer score (0–30) increased in the control group from 1.25 to 2.75 (ns) and 0.75 to 6.75 in the treatment group (p < .05). Median Modified Ashworth score increased 0/5 to 2/5 in the control group, but not in the treatment group, 0 to 0. Only one patient, in the treatment group, regained function of the affected hand. No side effects occurred.
 
Conclusion:
 
Treatment with the Finger Trainer was well tolerated in sub-acute & chronic stroke patients, whose abnormal muscle tone improved. In sub-acute stroke patients, the Finger Trainer group showed small improvements in active movement and avoided the increase in tone seen in the control group. This series was too small to demonstrate any effect on functional outcome however.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment