Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Clinical neurorestorative progress in stroke

Now if someone would take all this information and roll it into a strategy we could solve a lot of the problems in stroke. But our stroke associations will fail once again under current leadership and the boards of directors seem to be ok with the lack of doing anything for survivors.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php%3FfileID%3D24274&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm034irKXzL7rrFnJywNaCRRnUB1bA&nossl=1&oi=scholaralrt
Introduction
Stroke is identified by the sudden occurrence of a nonconvulsive, focal neurologic deficit.1 Among all the neurologic diseases of adult life, stroke ranks first in frequency and impact on disability. Stroke, after ischemic heart disease, is the second commonest single cause of death worldwide, with over five million deaths per year globally. The US Census Bureau has forecasted the distribution of incident stroke cases for the years 2010–2050. Over these 40 years, the number of incident strokes is expected to more than double, with the majority of the increase among the elderly (age .75 years) and minority groups (particularly Hispanics).2
Cerebral infarction basically comprises two pathophysiologic processes: 1) a loss in the supply of oxygen and glucose secondary to vascular occlusions and 2) an array of changes in cellular metabolism as a consequence of the collapse of energy-producing processes, with damage to cell membranes(neuronal cascade of death). Of potential therapeutic importance are the observations that some of the cellular processes leading to neuronal death are not irrevocable and may be reversed by early intervention, either restoration of blood flow or prevention of the influx of calcium into the cell. In the early stage, the most important therapy that can be taken into consideration is thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator, which is now a well-established treatment for acute ischemic stroke and is associated with significant improvements in outcomes.3 Unfortunately, the time window of 4.5 hours is its limitation. Other therapies for stroke are vascular revascularization and secondary prevention strategies. Vascular revascularization includes carotid endarterectomy and stenting. Secondary prevention strategies are mainly for hypertension, heart disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, hyperlipidemia, and antiplatelet, statin, and anticoagulant treatment. Together with the primary prevention concept for stroke, the main purpose of current therapies for stroke patients is to prevent stroke event other than to restore neurological impairment caused by the stroke.
However, when a stroke event really happens after all the possible treatments mentioned above, what can we do for the brain tissue lesion and how can we restore the functional impairment left by stroke? At first, neuroprotection is the important direction with a purpose to save the dying neuron with no encouraging results. Recently, a trend of switching from neuroprotectant toward neurorestorative approaches has been set on the fact that cerebral plasticity and neurological recovery can be stimulated in the post-acute ischemic brain. Neurorestorative processes include neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and synaptic plasticity, which have been shown to be beneficial for the functional improvement after stroke. In general, neurorestorative therapy includes pharmacological, cell-based, and neuromodulating therapy.4 In this review, we outline the clinical neurorestorative strategies with emphasis on cell-based therapy as a promising option for stroke.

Sections in the paper are:
Medicines and molecules
Radical scavengers
NMDA antagonists
Scavenging divalent metal ions
Minocycline
Cell therapy
G-CSF
“Exogenous” cell therapy for stroke
Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) and bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs)
BM-MNCs and BM-MSCs in chronic stage of stroke
Cultured neurons
Umbilical cord stromal cells
Autologous peripheral blood cells
Other cell type - fetal porcine cells
Combination cell therapy
Neuromodulation

No comments:

Post a Comment