Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.My back ground story is here:

Monday, March 30, 2015

Spectral Characteristics of Air and Bone Conduction Transducers used to Record the Auditory Brain Stem Response

Is this a better way to deliver music to you post-stroke? It also delivers mini vibrations, is that useful for your recovery? What does your doctor have to say? You'll have to ask you doctor what improvements have occurred in this field since 1985.
To help your doctor out there is this research;

Study Shows That Vibroacoustic Therapy is More Than Just Noise

Schwartz, Daniel M.; Larson, Vernon D.; De Chicchis, Albert R.

Collapse Box


This study sought to determine differences in the acoustic spectra of five different transducers commonly used for stimulus presentation to record the auditory brain stem response (ABR). The outputs of three commercially available bone conduction vibrators (Radioear B-70A, 8-71 and B-72), a TDH-49 earphone, and an insert receiver were measured by applying a 0.1 msec rectangular electrical pulse to each transducer. The resultant output for each transducer was converted to one-third octave band data and plotted against reference threshold levels. Results demonstrated relatively flat acoustic spectra and high output levels for the two air conduction receivers. In contrast, each of the bone oscillators had its greatest concentration of energy in the 2000 Hz region with the spectrum characterized by a precipitous decrease in output at frequencies above and below this resonance peak. Maximum output never exceeded 35 dB HL for any of the three bone conduction devices. Of the three oscillators, however, the B-70A appeared to provide the highest output before reaching saturation. Results are discussed relative to the limitations for recording the auditory brain stem response to bone conducted transient signals.

A current sample of what is available today;

No comments:

Post a Comment