http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00006/full?
Jinsook Roh1,2*, William Z. Rymer2,3,4 and Randall F. Beer2,3
- 1Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- 3Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Introduction
Broadly speaking, disturbances of motor function
following stroke can be attributed to three primary impairments: reduced
corticospinal drive to agonist muscles (weakness), altered reflex
activity (e.g., spasticity), and impaired motor coordination (Twitchell, 1951; Brunnstrom, 1970; Knutsson and Mårtensson, 1980).
In many patients, when weakness and spasticity are treated effectively,
or resolve spontaneously, motor dysfunction remains severe (Landau, 1980; Hesse et al., 1996; Dewald et al., 2001).
Accordingly, understanding the mechanisms that underlie impaired motor
coordination following stroke is essential for the design of effective
rehabilitation protocols.
Behavioral and stimulation-based studies in motor
systems suggest that normal neuromuscular coordination can be achieved
by activating a relatively limited number of muscle synergies, each of
which represents a pattern of muscle activation with distinct spatial
(and in some formulations, temporal) characteristics (Tresch et al., 1999; Ivanenko et al., 2004; Cheung et al., 2005; d’Avella and Bizzi, 2005; d’Avella et al., 2006, 2008; Torres-Oviedo et al., 2006; Torres-Oviedo and Ting, 2007; Kargo et al., 2010; Overduin et al., 2012).
Muscle synergies have been identified as building blocks for a variety
of motor tasks in humans, including postural responses (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2003; Weiss and Flanders, 2004; Torres-Oviedo and Ting, 2007), locomotion (Clark et al., 2010; Monaco et al., 2010), hand shaping and signing (Santello et al., 1998; Weiss and Flanders, 2004; Ajiboye and Weir, 2009), isometric force generation in the upper extremity (Roh et al., 2012), and reaching movements performed under different biomechanical constraints (Sabatini, 2002; d’Avella et al., 2006, 2008; Cheung et al., 2009a; Muceli et al., 2010).
Furthermore, muscle synergies generalize across different task
constraints, as shown in recent animal studies of postural responses
involving different perturbation types and postures (Torres-Oviedo et al., 2006) as well as voluntary motor behaviors (Roh et al., 2011). Similarly, muscle synergies have been shown to be quite robust in intact humans (Valero-Cuevas, 2000; Ivanenko et al., 2004; d’Avella et al., 2006, 2008; Chvatal et al., 2011; Hug et al., 2011; Roh et al., 2012). The use of muscle synergies may facilitate control of task-level variables (Ting and Macpherson, 2005; Torres-Oviedo et al., 2006; McKay and Ting, 2008),
and/or simplify the generation of motor behaviors by reducing the
dimensionality of the control problem associated with mechanically
redundant musculature (Grillner, 1985; Bizzi et al., 1991; Tresch et al., 1999; Fetz et al., 2000; Tresch et al., 2002; Miller, 2004; Bizzi et al., 2008; d’Avella and Lacquaniti, 2013).
Several recent studies have examined how stroke impacts the modular control of voluntary limb movements (Cheung et al., 2009b, 2012; Clark et al., 2010).The
initial study, which focused on reaching movements performed by a group
of chronic stroke survivors with predominantly mild impairment,
concluded that stroke altered the recruitment patterns of normal muscle
synergies, rather than altering synergy internal structure (Cheung et al., 2009b).
A subsequent study involving subjects with a diverse range of
impairment levels confirmed preservation of normal muscle synergies in
mildly impaired stroke survivors, but reported evidence of merging and
fractionation of normal synergies in more impaired stroke subjects (Cheung et al., 2012). Similarly, Clark et al. (2010)
found that fewer muscle synergies were required to reconstruct
locomotor muscle activation patterns in more impaired stroke survivors,
reflecting an apparent merging of synergies identified in healthy
subjects. Overall, these studies suggest that alterations in muscle
synergy structure are mainly evident in stroke survivors with severe
impairment.
Muscle synergies are potentially shaped by biomechanical or task constraints, independent of putative neural constraints (Todorov, 2004; Kutch and Valero-Cuevas, 2012).
Thus, differences in task performance between stroke survivors and
healthy controls are a potential confounding factor when comparing the
number and structure of muscle synergies underlying voluntary limb
movements. Accordingly, we developed an isometric protocol that provides
an opportunity to more closely match task variables (i.e., limb posture
and required force level) across healthy and impaired individuals. Our
initial study, confined to chronic stroke survivors with severe motor
impairment, examined muscle synergies underlying isometric force
generation at the hand (Roh et al., 2013). In contrast to the results for dynamic tasks (Cheung et al., 2009b, 2012; Clark et al., 2010),
we found preservation of the number of muscle synergies in the affected
arm of severely impaired stroke survivors and relatively stereotyped
alterations in specific muscle synergies related to the activation of
shoulder muscles.
As an extension of our previous study (Roh et al., 2013),
the current study focused on higher functioning stroke survivors.
Specifically, we hypothesized that alterations in muscle synergy
structure are also evident in stroke survivors with mild or moderate
impairment. To evaluate this hypothesis, subjects with mild and moderate
motor impairment completed a 3-D isometric force target matching
protocol identical to Roh et al. (2013).
Synergies underlying shoulder and elbow muscle activations were
identified using non-negative matrix factorization, and compared with
those previously identified in age-matched healthy subjects and severely
impaired stroke survivors.
No comments:
Post a Comment