http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/12/1/93
1
Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Akdeniz University Faculty
of Medicine, B Block Level 2, Dumlupınar Bulvarı, Antalya, 07070, Turkey
2 Akdeniz University Faculty of Electric and Electronic Engineering, Antalya, 07070, Turkey
3 Sakarya University Institute of Natural Sciences, Adapazarı, 54000, Turkey
2 Akdeniz University Faculty of Electric and Electronic Engineering, Antalya, 07070, Turkey
3 Sakarya University Institute of Natural Sciences, Adapazarı, 54000, Turkey
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2015, 12:93
doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0084-7
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/12/1/93
The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/12/1/93
Received: | 19 June 2015 |
Accepted: | 13 October 2015 |
Published: | 20 October 2015 |
© 2015 Gürbüz et al.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Abstract
Background
Spasticity is a motor impairment due to lesions in the brain and spinal cord. Despite
being a well-known problem, difficulties remain in the assessment of the condition.
The electrophysiological and kinesiological characteristics of the patellar pendulum
changes during the movement triggered by the patellar T reflex could be used to assess
spasticity.
Methods
Features of the patellar pendulum during the patellar T reflex were considered using
a goniometric approach in spastic patients evaluated with the Ashworth scale. Medium
and late latency responses in the rectus and biceps femoris muscles were examined
electrophysiologically. For each pendulum, the maximum angle extension during an oscillation
of the knee joint, maximal extension time, angular velocities of extensions of the
knee joint and frequency of motion due to the patellar reflex were calculated. The
damping of the amplitude in the pendulum was calculated.
Results
The spasticity group consisted of 65 patients (38 males and 27 females) with a mean
age of 47.6 ± 14.0 years. The normal control group consisted of 25 individuals (19
males and six females) with a mean age of 32.1 ± 10 years. The biceps and rectus femoris
long latency late responses were not observed in the normal cases. The biceps femoris
medium latency response was observed only in 24 % of healthy individuals; conversely,
late responses were observed in 84 % of patients. Activation of the antagonist muscles
at a certain level of spasticity created a notching phenomenon. Amplitude of the reflex response and mean angular velocity of the first oscillation
present in a dichotomic nature in the spasticity groups. Frequency of the first pendular
oscillation increased with the increase of the Ashworth scale, while the damping ratio
decreased with increasing scale. The Ashworth scale showed a correlation with the
damping ratio. The damping ratio strongly distinguished the spastic subgroups and
showed a strong negative correlation with the Ashworth scale.
Conclusions
The Ashworth scale presents a good correlation with kinesiological parameters, but
it is only possible to differentiate normal and spastic cases with electrophysiologic
parameters. Furthermore, the notching phenomenon could be evaluated as a determinant
of spasticity.
No comments:
Post a Comment