Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Care Trajectories of Veterans in the 12 Months After Hospitalization for Acute Ischemic Stroke

To get better care trajectories you would have to vastly reduce dead and damaged neurons by stopping the neuronal cascade of death.
http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org/content/8/6_suppl_3/S131.abstract?etoc
  1. Dawn M. Bravata, MD
+ Author Affiliations
  1. From the Stroke Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (G.A., L.J.M., L.S.W., D.M.B.) and Center for Health Information and Communication (L.J.M., J.K.D., D.M.B.), Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; School of Nursing and Center for Aging and the Life Course, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN (G.A.); Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing (M.J.R.); Department of Biostatistics (S.O., J.K.D), Department of Neurology (L.S.W.), and Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics (D.M.B., L.J.M.), Indiana University School of Medicine; Regenstrief Institute (L.S.W., D.M.B.), Indianapolis, IN; Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, and Baltimore VA Medical Center (M.S.P.); and College of Health and Human Services, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green (N.C.).
  1. Correspondence to Greg Arling, PhD, School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email garling@purdue.edu

Abstract

Background—Recovery after a stroke varies greatly between individuals and is reflected by wide variation in the use of institutional and home care services. This study sought to classify veterans according to their care trajectories in the 12 months after hospitalization for ischemic stroke.
Methods and Results—The sample consisted of 3811 veterans hospitalized for ischemic stroke in Veterans Health Administration facilities in 2007. Three outcomes—nursing home care, home care, and mortality—were modeled jointly >12 months using latent class growth analysis. Data on Veterans’ care use and cost came from the Veterans Administration and Medicare. Covariates included stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), functional status (functional independence measure score), age, marital status, chronic conditions, and prestroke ambulation. Five care trajectories were identified: 49% of Veterans had Rapid Recovery with little or no use of care; 15% had a Steady Recovery with initially high nursing home or home care that tapered off; 9% had Long-Term Home Care; 13% had Long-Term Nursing Home Care; and 14% had an Unstable trajectory with multiple transitions between long-term and acute care settings. Care use was greatest for individuals with more severe strokes, lower functioning at hospital discharge, and older age. Average annual costs were highest for individuals with the Long-Term Nursing Home trajectory ($63 082), closely followed by individuals with the Unstable trajectory ($58 720). Individual with the Rapid Recovery trajectory had the lowest costs ($9271).
Conclusions—Care trajectories after stroke were associated with stroke severity and functional dependency and they had a dramatic impact on subsequent costs.

No comments:

Post a Comment