Changing stroke rehab and research worldwide now.Time is Brain! trillions and trillions of neurons that DIE each day because there are NO effective hyperacute therapies besides tPA(only 12% effective). I have 523 posts on hyperacute therapy, enough for researchers to spend decades proving them out. These are my personal ideas and blog on stroke rehabilitation and stroke research. Do not attempt any of these without checking with your medical provider. Unless you join me in agitating, when you need these therapies they won't be there.

What this blog is for:

My blog is not to help survivors recover, it is to have the 10 million yearly stroke survivors light fires underneath their doctors, stroke hospitals and stroke researchers to get stroke solved. 100% recovery. The stroke medical world is completely failing at that goal, they don't even have it as a goal. Shortly after getting out of the hospital and getting NO information on the process or protocols of stroke rehabilitation and recovery I started searching on the internet and found that no other survivor received useful information. This is an attempt to cover all stroke rehabilitation information that should be readily available to survivors so they can talk with informed knowledge to their medical staff. It lays out what needs to be done to get stroke survivors closer to 100% recovery. It's quite disgusting that this information is not available from every stroke association and doctors group.

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

Even minor distress puts you at risk of chronic disease

You are under major distress from your doctor having nothing to get you 100% recovered. Your doctor won't have anything to counteract this distress either so you are completely fucking screwed. So your distress could increase your risk of cardiovascular and neurological disease.
https://www.mdlinx.com/internal-medicine/top-medical-news/article/2018/07/16/7528413/?
Healthline/Medical News Today | July 16, 2018

Dealing with anxiety, depression, and stress at intense levels for a long time can impact our long-term physical health. But what if we are exposed to low levels of psychological distress? Does it still jeopardize our well-being? According to a new study, the answer is "yes."
"Although the relationship between significant distress and the onset of arthritis, [chronic pulmonary obstructive disorder], cardiovascular disease, and diabetes is well established," says Professor Catharine Gale, from the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom, "there is a significant gap in knowledge regarding the link between lower and moderate levels of distress and the development of chronic conditions."
Alongside Kyle McLachlan, at the University of Edinburgh in the UK, Professor Gale conducted a study investigating whether exposure to low and moderate psychological distress—which includes symptoms of anxiety and depression—could increase the risk of developing a chronic disease.
, indicate that we do not need to experience a lot of distress in order for our physical health to be endangered. A little distress will suffice, the authors warn.

Reducing distress may prevent disease onset

In the new study, the researchers analyzed relevant data collected from 16,485 adults for a period of 3 years. Professor Gale and McLachlan obtain this information using the UK Household Longitudinal Study, which gathers data regarding the health status, well-being, and living conditions—among other things—of UK citizens.
They looked specifically for links between psychological distress and the development of four chronic diseases: diabetes, arthritis, lung disease, and cardiovascular disease.
They also investigated whether any such association could be explained by modifiable factors, such as eating habits, exercise, or smoking, or by participants' socioeconomic status.
Professor Gale and McLachlan's study found that, despite the fact that they are not considered clinically significant, even low to moderate levels of experienced distress can heighten the risk for a chronic condition later in life.
"Our findings show that even low levels of distress, below the level usually considered clinically significant, appear to increase the risk of developing a chronic disease, so intervention to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression may help to prevent the onset of these illnesses for some people."
–Professor Catharine Gale
Compared with people who reported no symptoms of psychological distress, those who reported low distress levels were 57% more likely to develop arthritis.
Also, those experiencing moderate levels of distress were 72% more likely to develop this condition, and individuals reporting high distress levels were 110% more likely.
Similar associations were also found for cardiovascular disease and lung disease (specifically, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]).
In fact, people with low levels of distress were 46% more likely to develop cardiovascular problems, those with moderate levels had a 77% higher risk, and those exposed to high levels of distress had a 189% higher risk.
For lung disease, the risk did not rise in people reporting low distress levels, but it was heightened by 125% in those with moderate distress levels, and by 148% in people with high distress levels.
However, the researchers found no significant links between psychological distress and the development of diabetes.

'Considerable public health implications'

The researchers note that the new study's results could change the way in which public health policies consider risk factors for chronic diseases.
"These findings have considerable clinical and public health implications," explains Gale.

"Screening for distress," she explains, "may help to identify those at risk of developing arthritis, COPD, and cardiovascular disease, while interventions to improve distress may help to prevent and limit progression of disease, even for people with low levels of distress."

Distress is a potentially modifiable risk factor, so if the links found by this study are confirmed by further research, it could indicate a new pathway in terms of preventive strategies for chronic diseases.
Professor Cyrus Cooper, the director of the Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit at the UK Medical Research Council, believes that Professor Gale and McLachlan's findings have "the potential to have a major impact on the development and management of chronic diseases."
Dr. Iain Simpson, former president of the British Cardiovascular Society, states that "cardiovascular disease remains one of the major causes of death and disability," so "[the] knowledge that distress, even at low levels, is also a risk factor is an important finding, which could have significant clinical implications."

To read more, click here.

No comments:

Post a Comment